Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Reduction in ionizing radiation exposure during minimally invasive anterior plate osteosynthesis of distal radius fracture: Naive versus deliberate practice.
Delbarre, M; Hidalgo Diaz, J J; Xavier, F; Meyer, N; Sapa, M-C; Liverneaux, P.
Afiliación
  • Delbarre M; Department of Hand Surgery, Strasbourg University Hospitals, FMTS, 1 Avenue Molière, 67200 Strasbourg, France.
  • Hidalgo Diaz JJ; Department of Orthopedics, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims, Hôpital Maison Blanche, 45 Rue Cognacq Jay, 51100 Reims, France.
  • Xavier F; Department of Pediatric Surgery, Brest University Hospitals, 2 Avenue Foch, 29200 Brest, France.
  • Meyer N; Strasbourg University Hospital, Service de Santé Publique, GMRC, 1 Place de L'Hôpital, 67091 Strasbourg Cedex, France.
  • Sapa MC; Department of Hand Surgery, Strasbourg University Hospitals, FMTS, 1 Avenue Molière, 67200 Strasbourg, France.
  • Liverneaux P; Department of Hand Surgery, Strasbourg University Hospitals, FMTS, 1 Avenue Molière, 67200 Strasbourg, France; ICube CNRS, UMR 7357, Strasbourg University, 2-4 Rue Boussingault, 67000 Strasbourg, France. Electronic address: philippe.liverneaux@chru-strasbourg.fr.
Hand Surg Rehabil ; 41(2): 194-198, 2022 04.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34920144
ABSTRACT
This study aimed to decrease surgeon exposure to ionizing radiation through a new learning technique, "deliberate practice", which consists in improving performance by setting goals with feedback. The hypothesis was that exposure to ionizing radiation during distal radius fracture surgery using the minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) technique decreased faster with "deliberate" practice than with "naïve" practice. Radiographic dosimetry was measured in the first 30 fractures operated on by MIPO by 6 surgeons. The first 3 surgeons operated "naively" (Group 1) and the next 3 according to the "deliberate" procedure (Group 2). Group 2 received weekly feedback (number of exposed hands, number of fluoroscopic views, exposure duration, and X-ray dose). An expert, using fluoroscopic images and surgical videos, provided suggestions for improvement. Mean number of exposed hands was 23.66 in Group 1 and 1.9 in Group 2. Mean number of fluoroscopic views was 78.31 and 35.0, respectively. Mean X-ray exposure time was 74.34 and 32.89 s, respectively. Mean dosimetry was 1.40 mGy (and 0.59 mGy, respectively. The hypothesis was thus confirmed dosimetry decreased faster in Group 2 than in Group 1. Teaching this deliberate practice should be generalized, to decrease the growth phase and increase the plateau phase of the learning curve.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fracturas del Radio Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Hand Surg Rehabil Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Francia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fracturas del Radio Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Hand Surg Rehabil Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Francia