Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A resource for understanding and evaluating outcomes of undergraduate field experiences.
Shortlidge, Erin E; Jolley, Alison; Shaulskiy, Stephanie; Geraghty Ward, Emily; Lorentz, Christopher N; O'Connell, Kari.
Afiliación
  • Shortlidge EE; Department of Biology Portland State University Portland Oregon USA.
  • Jolley A; Te Puna Ako - Centre for Tertiary Teaching & Learning University of Waikato Hamilton New Zealand.
  • Shaulskiy S; Biological Station University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan USA.
  • Geraghty Ward E; Geology Program Rocky Mountain College Billings Montana USA.
  • Lorentz CN; Department of Biological Sciences Thomas More University Crestview Hills Kentucky USA.
  • O'Connell K; STEM Research Center Oregon State University Corvallis Oregon USA.
Ecol Evol ; 11(23): 16387-16408, 2021 Dec.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34938443
ABSTRACT
Undergraduate field experiences (UFEs) are a prominent element of science education across many disciplines; however, empirical data regarding the outcomes are often limited. UFEs are unique in that they typically take place in a field setting, are often interdisciplinary, and include diverse students. UFEs range from courses, to field trips, to residential research experiences, and thereby have the potential to yield a plethora of outcomes for undergraduate participants. The UFE community has expressed interest in better understanding how to assess the outcomes of UFEs. In response, we developed a guide for practitioners to use when assessing their UFE that promotes an evidence-based, systematic, iterative approach. This essay guides practitioners through the steps of identifying intended UFE outcomes, considering contextual factors, determining an assessment approach, and using the information gained to inform next steps. We provide a table of common learning outcomes with aligned assessment tools, and vignettes to illustrate using the assessment guide. We aim to support comprehensive, informed assessment of UFEs, thus leading to more inclusive and reflective UFE design, and ultimately improved student outcomes. We urge practitioners to move toward evidence-based advocacy for continued support of UFEs.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Ecol Evol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Ecol Evol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article
...