Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of inaccurate small field output factors on brain SRS plans.
Dobberthien, Brennen J; Cao, Fred; Zhao, Yingli; Harvey, Eric; Badragan, Genoveva.
Afiliación
  • Dobberthien BJ; BC Cancer, Surrey, BC, Canada.
  • Cao F; BC Cancer, Surrey, BC, Canada.
  • Zhao Y; BC Cancer, Surrey, BC, Canada.
  • Harvey E; BC Cancer, Surrey, BC, Canada.
  • Badragan G; BC Cancer, Surrey, BC, Canada.
Biomed Phys Eng Express ; 8(2)2022 02 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35021167
External beam radiotherapy often includes the use of field sizes 3 × 3 cm2or less, which can be defined as small fields. Dosimetry is a difficult, yet important part of the radiotherapy process. The dosimetry of small fields has additional challenges, which can lead to treatment inconsistencies if not done properly. Most important is the use of an appropriate detector, as well as the application of the necessary corrections. The International Atomic Energy Agency and the American Association of Physicists in Medicine provide the International Code of Practice (CoP) TRS-483 for the dosimetry of small static fields used in external MV photon beams. It gives guidelines on how to apply small-field correction factors for small field dosimetry. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of inaccurate small-field output factors on clinical brain stereotactic radiosurgery plans with and without applying the small-field correction factors as suggested in the CoP. Small-field correction factors for a Varian TrueBeam linear accelerator were applied to uncorrected relative dose factors. Uncorrected and corrected clinical plans were created with two different beam configurations, 6 MV with a flattening filter (6 WFF) and 6 MV without a flattening filter (6 FFF). For the corrected plans, the planning target volume mean dose was 1.6 ± 0.9% lower with p < 0.001 for 6 WFF and 1.8 ± 1.5% lower with p < 0.001 for 6 FFF. For brainstem, a major organ at risk, the corrected plans had a dose that was 1.6 ± 0.9% lower with p = 0.03 for 6 WFF and 1.8 ± 1.5% lower with p = 0.10 for 6 FFF. This represents a systematic error that should and can be corrected.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Aceleradores de Partículas / Fotones Tipo de estudio: Guideline País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Biomed Phys Eng Express Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Aceleradores de Partículas / Fotones Tipo de estudio: Guideline País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Biomed Phys Eng Express Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá Pais de publicación: Reino Unido