Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Thoracic ultrasound competence for ultrasound guided pleural procedures: The creation and validation of an assessment tool for use in the certification of basic thoracic ultrasound competence.
McCracken, David J; Bedawi, Eihab O; Stevenson, Michael; Cullen, Kathy M; Stanton, Andrew E; Rahman, Najib M.
Afiliación
  • McCracken DJ; Oxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK.
  • Bedawi EO; Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, UK.
  • Stevenson M; Queen's University Belfast, Centre for Medical Education, Mulhouse Building, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, UK.
  • Cullen KM; Oxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK.
  • Stanton AE; Oxford Respiratory Trials Unit, Oxford, UK.
  • Rahman NM; Queen's University Belfast, Centre for Medical Education, Mulhouse Building, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, UK.
J Clin Ultrasound ; 50(6): 781-788, 2022 Jul.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35034353
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Focused thoracic ultrasound (TUS) provides an increased safety profile when undertaking invasive pleural procedures. This has led to the requirement for defined curricula, high quality teaching and robust, validated assessment tools among physicians to ensure patient safety and clinical excellence. Current UK practice is based almost exclusively on expert consensus, but assessment methods employed have been shown to have low reliability and validity and are potentially open to bias. As a result, several assessment tools have been developed, although each has its own limitations.

METHODS:

This study aimed to develop and validate an assessment tool corresponding to those skills associated with the most basic level of practice, defined recently as an emergency level operator in the British Thoracic Society Training Standards for Thoracic Ultrasound.

RESULTS:

A total of 27 candidates were enrolled by two examiners based in Belfast and Oxford over a 10-month period between February and November 2019. Mean score of the inexperienced group was 44.3 (95% CI 39.2-49.4, range 28-54) compared with 74.9 (95% CI 72.8-77, range 64-80) in the experienced group providing an estimated mean difference of 30.7 between the two groups (95% CI 24.7-36.7; p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS:

This tool appears to discriminate between trainees with limited experience of TUS performance and those with no experience. It has the potential to form part of the assessment strategy for trainees in the United Kingdom and beyond, alongside well established assessment tools in postgraduate training.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Certificación / Competencia Clínica Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Ultrasound Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Certificación / Competencia Clínica Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Ultrasound Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido