Indirect comparison of pembrolizumab monotherapy versus nivolumab + ipilimumab in first-line metastatic lung cancer.
Immunotherapy
; 14(5): 295-307, 2022 04.
Article
en En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-35073727
ABSTRACT
Aim:
This study indirectly compared the effectiveness of pembrolizumab monotherapy versus nivolumab + ipilimumab in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. Materials andmethods:
A matching-adjusted indirect comparison was conducted using pooled individual patient data from KEYNOTE-024 and KEYNOTE-042 and published aggregate data from CheckMate 227 Part 1A, with platinum doublet chemotherapy as the anchor.Results:
After matching, estimated hazard ratios (95% CI) of pembrolizumab monotherapy versus nivolumab + ipilimumab for overall survival and progression-free survival were 1.07 (0.82, 1.39) and 1.16 (0.93, 1.45), respectively. For objective response rate, the estimated risk ratio (95% CI) was 0.93 (0.71, 1.22) and the risk difference (95% CI) was -2.86%(-11.38, 5.67).Conclusion:
Matching-adjusted indirect comparison results demonstrated comparable effectiveness between pembrolizumab monotherapy and nivolumab + ipilimumab as first-line therapies for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer with PD-L1 tumor-proportion score ≥1%.Palabras clave
Texto completo:
1
Colección:
01-internacional
Base de datos:
MEDLINE
Asunto principal:
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas
/
Neoplasias Pulmonares
Límite:
Humans
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Immunotherapy
Asunto de la revista:
ALERGIA E IMUNOLOGIA
/
TERAPEUTICA
Año:
2022
Tipo del documento:
Article
País de afiliación:
Estados Unidos