Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
On the Q statistic with constant weights for standardized mean difference.
Bakbergenuly, Ilyas; Hoaglin, David C; Kulinskaya, Elena.
Afiliación
  • Bakbergenuly I; School of Computing Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
  • Hoaglin DC; Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Kulinskaya E; School of Computing Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Br J Math Stat Psychol ; 75(3): 444-465, 2022 11.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35094381
ABSTRACT
Cochran's Q statistic is routinely used for testing heterogeneity in meta-analysis. Its expected value is also used in several popular estimators of the between-study variance, τ 2 . Those applications generally have not considered the implications of its use of estimated variances in the inverse-variance weights. Importantly, those weights make approximating the distribution of Q (more explicitly, Q IV ) rather complicated. As an alternative, we investigate a new Q statistic, Q F , whose constant weights use only the studies' effective sample sizes. For the standardized mean difference as the measure of effect, we study, by simulation, approximations to distributions of Q IV and Q F , as the basis for tests of heterogeneity and for new point and interval estimators of τ 2 . These include new DerSimonian-Kacker-type moment estimators based on the first moment of Q F , and novel median-unbiased estimators. The results show that an approximation based on an algorithm of Farebrother follows both the null and the alternative distributions of Q F reasonably well, whereas the usual chi-squared approximation for the null distribution of Q IV and the Biggerstaff-Jackson approximation to its alternative distribution are poor; in estimating τ 2 , our moment estimator based on Q F is almost unbiased, the Mandel - Paule estimator has some negative bias in some situations, and the DerSimonian-Laird and restricted maximum likelihood estimators have considerable negative bias; and all 95% interval estimators have coverage that is too high when τ 2 = 0 , but otherwise the Q-profile interval performs very well.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Algoritmos / Modelos Estadísticos Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Br J Math Stat Psychol Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Algoritmos / Modelos Estadísticos Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Br J Math Stat Psychol Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido
...