Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Refutation Text Facilitates Learning: a Meta-Analysis of Between-Subjects Experiments.
Schroeder, Noah L; Kucera, Aurelia C.
Afiliación
  • Schroeder NL; Department of Leadership Studies in Education and Organizations, Wright State University, 3640 Colonel Glenn Highway, Dayton, OH 45435 USA.
  • Kucera AC; Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine at Seton Hill, 20 Seton Hill Dr, Greensburg, PA 15601 USA.
Educ Psychol Rev ; 34(2): 957-987, 2022.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35095236
Scientific misconceptions are ubiquitous, and in our era of near-instant information exchange, this can be problematic for both public health and the public understanding of scientific topics. Refutation text is one instructional tool for addressing misconceptions and is simple to implement at little cost. We conducted a random-effects meta-analysis to examine the effectiveness of the refutation text structure on learning. Analysis of 44 independent comparisons (n = 3,869) showed that refutation text is associated with a positive, moderate effect (g = 0.41, p < .001) compared to other learning conditions. This effect was consistent and robust across a wide variety of contexts. Our results support the implementation of refutation text to help facilitate scientific understanding in many fields. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10648-021-09656-z.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Educ Psychol Rev Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Educ Psychol Rev Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos