Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Systematic Review of the Current In Vitro Experience of the Endovascular Treatment of Juxtarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms by Fenestrated and Parallel Endografting.
Taneva, Gergana T; Mirgolbabaee, Hadi; Groot Jebbink, Erik; Reijnen, Michel M P J; Donas, Konstantinos P.
Afiliación
  • Taneva GT; Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Asklepios Clinic Langen, University of Frankfurt, Langen, Germany.
  • Mirgolbabaee H; Multi-Modality Medical Imaging (M3I) Group, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
  • Groot Jebbink E; Multi-Modality Medical Imaging (M3I) Group, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
  • Reijnen MMPJ; Department of Surgery, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
  • Donas KP; Multi-Modality Medical Imaging (M3I) Group, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
J Endovasc Ther ; 30(1): 8-17, 2023 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35114834
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To identify and analyze the published in vitro benchtop experiments for the assessment of endovascular techniques used for the treatment of juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (jAAAs). DATA SOURCES Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science. REVIEW

METHODS:

A systematic literature search was carried out throughout March 2021 following PRISMA guidelines. Two investigators independently performed title and abstract screening to reveal all benchtop testing evaluating the endovascular treatment of jAAA.

RESULTS:

A total of 19 studies were included, 8 evaluating fenestrated (FEVAR) and 11 parallel grafts (PGs). FEVAR studies used different custom testing apparatus (n=7) or 3D-printed models (n=1) to analyze dislodgement and migration resistance, misalignment consequences and causation, and bridging stents' radial force, flareability, fatigue, and fracture resistance. All PG studies used silicone-based models to analyze optimal oversizing, sealing length, gutter behavior, and possible reduction. Test evaluation in FEVAR in vitro testing was based on pullout force analysis (N=5), photo evaluation (n=1), fluoroscopy (n=1), X-rays (n=4), CT analysis (n=3), macro- and microscopic evaluation (n=4), water permeability (n=1), and fatigue simulator testing (n=1), while it was based on CT analysis in all PG studies adding ECG-gate in one study. The most frequently tested devices were Zenit (Cook) (n=7), Endurant (Medtronic) (n=5), and Excluder (Gore) (n=5) as main grafts, and Advanta V12 (n=14) as the bridging device.

CONCLUSIONS:

This systematic review presents a broad analysis of the current in vitro methods evaluating the endovascular treatment of jAAA. Fundamental issues have been benchtop tested in both FEVAR and PGs. The analysis of the included studies allowed to recommend an optimal testing design. In vitro testing is a potential tool to further elucidate points of attention hard to investigate in vivo to finally enhance the endovascular treatment outcomes. Future in vitro studies are needed to evaluate the in vitro performance of all indistinctively used devices in the clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal / Implantación de Prótesis Vascular / Procedimientos Endovasculares Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Endovasc Ther Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal / Implantación de Prótesis Vascular / Procedimientos Endovasculares Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Endovasc Ther Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania