Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Accuracy of Continuous Glucose Monitors for Inpatient Diabetes Management.
Wright, Jordan J; Williams, Alexander J; Friedman, Sally B; Weaver, Rita G; Williams, Jonathan M; Hodge, Elizabeth; Fowler, Michael; Bao, Shichun.
Afiliación
  • Wright JJ; Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Williams AJ; Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Friedman SB; Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Weaver RG; Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Williams JM; Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Hodge E; Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Fowler M; Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Bao S; Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
J Diabetes Sci Technol ; 17(5): 1252-1255, 2023 09.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35128974
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

In hospitalized patients, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) may improve glycemic control, prevent hypoglycemic events, and reduce staff workload compared with point-of-care (POC) capillary glucose monitoring.

METHODS:

To evaluate CGM accuracy and safety of use in the inpatient setting, two versions of CGM sensors were placed on 43 and 34 adult patients with diabetes admitted to non-intensive care unit (ICU) medical wards, respectively. CGM accuracy relative to POC and safety of use were measured by calculating mean absolute relative difference (MARD) and by Clarke Error Grid (CEG) analysis.

RESULTS:

CGM version 2 had improved accuracy compared with CGM version 1 with MARD 17.7 compared with 21.4%. CGM accuracy did not change with POC value or with time of sensor wear. On CEG, 98.8% of paired values fell within acceptable zones A and B.

CONCLUSION:

Despite reduced accuracy compared with the outpatient setting, both versions of CGMs had acceptable safety profiles in the inpatient setting.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Glucemia / Diabetes Mellitus Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Diabetes Sci Technol Asunto de la revista: ENDOCRINOLOGIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Glucemia / Diabetes Mellitus Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Diabetes Sci Technol Asunto de la revista: ENDOCRINOLOGIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos