Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation in Life Cycle of Information Technology (ELICIT) framework: Supporting the innovation life cycle from business case assessment to summative evaluation.
Kukhareva, Polina V; Weir, Charlene; Del Fiol, Guilherme; Aarons, Gregory A; Taft, Teresa Y; Schlechter, Chelsey R; Reese, Thomas J; Curran, Rebecca L; Nanjo, Claude; Borbolla, Damian; Staes, Catherine J; Morgan, Keaton L; Kramer, Heidi S; Stipelman, Carole H; Shakib, Julie H; Flynn, Michael C; Kawamoto, Kensaku.
Afiliación
  • Kukhareva PV; Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Electronic address: polina.kukhareva@utah.edu.
  • Weir C; Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Electronic address: charlene.weir@utah.edu.
  • Del Fiol G; Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Electronic address: guilherme.delfiol@utah.edu.
  • Aarons GA; Department of Psychiatry, UC San Diego ACTRI Dissemination and Implementation Science Center, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA; Dissemination and Implementation Science Center, Altman Clinical and Translational Research Institute, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. Electronic address: gaarons@health.uc
  • Taft TY; Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Electronic address: teresa.taft@utah.edu.
  • Schlechter CR; Department of Population Health Sciences, Center for Health Outcomes and Population Equity, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; Center for Health Outcomes and Population Equity, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Electronic add
  • Reese TJ; Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA. Electronic address: thomas.reese@vumc.org.
  • Curran RL; Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Electronic address: rebecca.curran@hsc.utah.edu.
  • Nanjo C; Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Electronic address: claude.nanjo@utah.edu.
  • Borbolla D; Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Electronic address: damian.borbolla@utah.edu.
  • Staes CJ; College of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Electronic address: catherine.staes@hsc.utah.edu.
  • Morgan KL; Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Electronic address: keaton.morgan@utah.edu.
  • Kramer HS; Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Electronic address: heidi.kramer@hsc.utah.edu.
  • Stipelman CH; Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Electronic address: carole.stipelman@hsc.utah.edu.
  • Shakib JH; Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Electronic address: julie.shakib@hsc.utah.edu.
  • Flynn MC; Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; Community Physicians Group, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Electronic address: michael.flynn@hsc.utah.edu.
  • Kawamoto K; Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Electronic address: kensaku.kawamoto@utah.edu.
J Biomed Inform ; 127: 104014, 2022 03.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35167977
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Our objective was to develop an evaluation framework for electronic health record (EHR)-integrated innovations to support evaluation activities at each of four information technology (IT) life cycle phases planning, development, implementation, and operation.

METHODS:

The evaluation framework was developed based on a review of existing evaluation frameworks from health informatics and other domains (human factors engineering, software engineering, and social sciences); expert consensus; and real-world testing in multiple EHR-integrated innovation studies.

RESULTS:

The resulting Evaluation in Life Cycle of IT (ELICIT) framework covers four IT life cycle phases and three measure levels (society, user, and IT). The ELICIT framework recommends 12 evaluation

steps:

(1) business case assessment; (2) stakeholder requirements gathering; (3) technical requirements gathering; (4) technical acceptability assessment; (5) user acceptability assessment; (6) social acceptability assessment; (7) social implementation assessment; (8) initial user satisfaction assessment; (9) technical implementation assessment; (10) technical portability assessment; (11) long-term user satisfaction assessment; and (12) social outcomes assessment.

DISCUSSION:

Effective evaluation requires a shared understanding and collaboration across disciplines throughout the entire IT life cycle. In contrast with previous evaluation frameworks, the ELICIT framework focuses on all phases of the IT life cycle across the society, user, and IT levels. Institutions seeking to establish evaluation programs for EHR-integrated innovations could use our framework to create such shared understanding and justify the need to invest in evaluation.

CONCLUSION:

As health care undergoes a digital transformation, it will be critical for EHR-integrated innovations to be systematically evaluated. The ELICIT framework can facilitate these evaluations.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Informática Médica / Tecnología de la Información Tipo de estudio: Health_technology_assessment / Prognostic_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Biomed Inform Asunto de la revista: INFORMATICA MEDICA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: EEUU / ESTADOS UNIDOS / ESTADOS UNIDOS DA AMERICA / EUA / UNITED STATES / UNITED STATES OF AMERICA / US / USA

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Informática Médica / Tecnología de la Información Tipo de estudio: Health_technology_assessment / Prognostic_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Biomed Inform Asunto de la revista: INFORMATICA MEDICA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: EEUU / ESTADOS UNIDOS / ESTADOS UNIDOS DA AMERICA / EUA / UNITED STATES / UNITED STATES OF AMERICA / US / USA