Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The impact of robotic surgery on a tertiary care colorectal surgery program, an assessment of costs and short term outcomes: A Canadian perspective.
Patel, Sunil V; Wiseman, Vanessa; Zhang, Lisa; MacDonald, P Hugh; Merchant, Shaila M; Barnett, Kathleen Wattie; Caycedo-Marulanda, Antonio.
Afiliación
  • Patel SV; Department of Surgery, Queens University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
  • Wiseman V; Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Kingston, ON, Canada.
  • Zhang L; Department of Surgery, Queens University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
  • MacDonald PH; Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Kingston, ON, Canada.
  • Merchant SM; Department of Surgery, Queens University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
  • Barnett KW; Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Kingston, ON, Canada.
  • Caycedo-Marulanda A; Department of Surgery, Queens University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Surg Endosc ; 36(8): 6084-6094, 2022 08.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35212820
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Robotic surgery for colorectal pathology has gained interest as it can overcome technical challenges and limitations of traditional laparoscopic surgery. A lack of training and costs have been cited as reasons for limiting its use in Canada. The objective of this paper was to assess the impact of robotic surgery on outcomes and costs in a Canadian setting.

METHODS:

This is a retrospective study of consecutive patients undergoing left sided colorectal surgery ("Pre-Robotic Phase" n = 145 vs. "Post Robotic Phase" n = 150) and a single tertiary care centre in Ontario, Canada. Utilization and success of minimally invasive surgery (MIS), length of stay, complications and hospital costs were compared. Univariate and Multivariate analysis was used for these comparisons.

RESULTS:

Characteristics, diagnosis and type of resection were similar between groups. Robotic Implementation resulted in higher rates of successful MIS (i.e. attempt at MIS without conversion) (85% vs. 47%, P < 0.001), shorter mean length of stay (4.7 days vs. 8.4 days, P < 0.001), and similar mean operative times (3.9 h vs. 3.9 h, P = 0.93). Emergency Department visits were fewer in the Robotic Phase (24% vs. 34%, P = 0.04), with no difference in readmission, anastomotic leak or unplanned reoperation. After robotic implementation, the mean total hospital costs decreased, but this was not statistically significant (-$1453, 95% CI -$3974 to +$1068, P = 0.25). Regression analysis, adjusting for age, gender, obesity, ASA and procedure showed similar findings (Robotic Phase -$657, 95% CI -$3038 to +$1724, vs Pre Robotic Phase [Reference], P = 0.59).

INTERPRETATION:

Implementation of a robotic colorectal surgery program in a Canadian tertiary care centre showed improved clinical outcomes, without a significant increase in the cost of care. Although this study is from a single institution, we have demonstrated that robotic colorectal surgery is feasible and can be cost effective in the right setting.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Laparoscopía / Cirugía Colorrectal / Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Surg Endosc Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Laparoscopía / Cirugía Colorrectal / Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Surg Endosc Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá
...