Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Classifying Conduct Disorder Using a Biopsychosocial Model and Machine Learning Method.
Chan, Lena; Simmons, Cortney; Tillem, Scott; Conley, May; Brazil, Inti A; Baskin-Sommers, Arielle.
Afiliación
  • Chan L; Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
  • Simmons C; Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
  • Tillem S; Department of Psychology, University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
  • Conley M; Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
  • Brazil IA; Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Forensic Psychiatric Centre Pompestichting, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • Baskin-Sommers A; Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut. Electronic address: arielle.baskin-sommers@yale.edu.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35217219
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Conduct disorder (CD) is a common syndrome with far-reaching effects. Risk factors for the development of CD span social, psychological, and biological domains. Researchers note that predictive models of CD are limited if the focus is on a single risk factor or even a single domain. Machine learning methods are optimized for the extraction of trends across multidomain data but have yet to be implemented in predicting the development of CD.

METHODS:

Social (e.g., family, income), psychological (e.g., psychiatric, neuropsychological), and biological (e.g., resting-state graph metrics) risk factors were measured using data from the baseline visit of the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study when youth were 9 to 10 years old (N = 2368). Applying a feed-forward neural network machine learning method, risk factors were used to predict CD diagnoses 2 years later.

RESULTS:

A model with factors that included social, psychological, and biological domains outperformed models representing factors within any single domain, predicting the presence of a CD diagnosis with 91.18% accuracy. Within each domain, certain factors stood out in terms of their relationship to CD (social lower parental monitoring, more aggression in the household, lower income; psychological greater attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and oppositional defiant disorder symptoms, worse crystallized cognition and card sorting performance; biological disruptions in the topology of subcortical and frontoparietal networks).

CONCLUSIONS:

The development of an accurate, sensitive, and specific predictive model of CD has the potential to aid in prevention and intervention efforts. Key risk factors for CD appear best characterized as reflecting unpredictable, impulsive, deprived, and emotional external and internal contexts.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad / Trastorno de la Conducta Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adolescent / Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad / Trastorno de la Conducta Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adolescent / Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article