Implications of Payment for Acute Myocardial Infarctions as a 90-Day Bundled Single Episode of Care: A Cost of Illness Analysis.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the cost of illness associated with the 90-day period following acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and the implication of care pathway (percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI] vs medical management [MM]), in order to assess the potential financial risk incurred by providers for AMI as an episode of care. PERSPECTIVE Reimbursement payment systems for acute care episodes are shifting from 30-day to 90-day bundled payment models. Since follow-up care and readmissions beyond the early days/weeks post-AMI are common, financial risk may be transferred to providers. SETTING: AMI hospitalization Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) standard analytical files between 10/1/2015 and 9/30/2016 were reviewed. METHODS: Included patients were Medicare beneficiaries with a primary diagnosis of AMI subsequently treated with either PCI or MM. Payments were standardized to remove geographic variation and separated into reimbursements for services during the hospitalization and from discharge to 90 days post-discharge. Results were stratified by Medicare Severity Diagnosis Related Groups (MS-DRGs) individually and grouped between patients treated with MM and PCI. Risk-adjusted likelihood of utilization of post-acute nursing care and all-cause readmission was assessed by logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 96,546 patients were included in the analysis. The highest total mean payment (US$32,714) was for MS-DRG 248 (PCI with non-drug-eluting stent with major complication or comorbidity). Total payments were similar between MM and PCI patients, but MM patients incurred the majority of costs in the post-acute period after discharge, with the converse true for PCI patients. MM without catheterization was associated with a twofold increase in risk of requiring post-acute nursing care and 90-day readmission versus PCI (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 2.01 [1.92-2.11] and 2.17 [2.08-2.27]). Smaller hospital size, diabetes, peripheral arterial disease, prior AMI, and multivessel disease were predictors of higher healthcare utilization. CONCLUSIONS: MS-DRGs associated with the lowest reimbursements (and presumably, lowest costs of inpatient care) incur the highest post-discharge expenditures. As the CMS Bundled Payment for Care Improvement and similar programs are implemented, there will be a need to account for heterogeneous post-discharge care costs. Video abstract (MP4 274659 KB).

Around 805,000 heart attacks occur annually in the US. With an average age over 65 years, many heart attack patients qualify for Medicare health insurance. Under Medicare, hospitals (or 'providers') receive reimbursements for the cost of care associated with 'acute care episodes' (e.g., heart attacks) as a 'bundled' payment. The bundled reimbursements are typically based on pre-defined prices, with hospitals paying the difference if actual costs exceed these. Reimbursements are typically given for care costs from the initial heart attack through to hospital discharge and care in the 30-day post-discharge period. However, recently introduced reimbursement models such as BPCI Advanced have moved to expand this to 90 days. Since follow-up care and additional cardiovascular readmissions are common beyond 30 days, extension of the reimbursement period to 90 days could increase financial risk to hospitals/providers if these additional costs are not included in reimbursements. To assess the potential impact of this, we investigated the cost of illness for heart attack and the implication of type of care medical management (standard medication given after heart attack) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI; standard medication plus a non-surgical procedure to widen heart blood vessels). We found that 90-day costs after heart attack are substantial regardless of type of care. We found that post-discharge costs were generally high, but higher for medically managed patients than those receiving PCI. Our analysis also suggests Medicare disease classifications associated with lowest payments for heart attack (and presumably, lowest hospitalization costs) are associated with the highest post-discharge expenditures. Overall, our study suggests that new payment models should account for variable post-discharge care costs, and new therapies are needed to reduce additional events, readmissions, and associated costs in heart attack patients.