Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Multi-Laboratory Comparison of Methods for Detection and Quantification of African Swine Fever Virus.
Olesen, Ann Sofie; Bruun Rasmussen, Thomas; Saxmose Nielsen, Søren; Belsham, Graham J; Boklund, Anette; Ploegaert, Tosca; Moonen-Leusen, Bernie; Blome, Sandra; Bøtner, Anette.
Afiliación
  • Olesen AS; DTU National Veterinary Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Lindholm, DK-4771 Kalvehave, Denmark.
  • Bruun Rasmussen T; Section of Veterinary Clinical Microbiology, Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
  • Saxmose Nielsen S; Department of Virus & Microbiological Special Diagnostics, Statens Serum Institut, DK-2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark.
  • Belsham GJ; DTU National Veterinary Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Lindholm, DK-4771 Kalvehave, Denmark.
  • Boklund A; Department of Virus & Microbiological Special Diagnostics, Statens Serum Institut, DK-2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark.
  • Ploegaert T; Section of Animal Welfare and Disease Control, Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
  • Moonen-Leusen B; DTU National Veterinary Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Lindholm, DK-4771 Kalvehave, Denmark.
  • Blome S; Section of Veterinary Clinical Microbiology, Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
  • Bøtner A; Section of Animal Welfare and Disease Control, Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Pathogens ; 11(3)2022 Mar 07.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35335649
ABSTRACT
African swine fever is a viral disease of the family Suidae. Methods to detect and quantify African swine fever virus (ASFV) include qPCR and virus infectivity assays. Individual laboratories often use in-house procedures for these assays, which can hamper the comparison of results. The objective of this study was to estimate the probability of ASFV detection using these assays, and to determine the inter-test correlations between results. This was achieved by testing a panel of 80 samples at three reference laboratories. Samples were analysed using nucleic acid extraction and qPCR, as well as virus infectivity assays. For qPCR, a very high probability (ranging from 0.96 to 1.0) of detecting ASFV DNA was observed for all tested systems. For virus infectivity assays in cells, the probability of detecting infectious ASFV varied from 0.68 to 0.90 and was highest using pulmonary alveolar macrophages, followed by MARC145 cells, peripheral blood monocytes, and finally wild boar lung cells. Intraclass correlation coefficient estimates of 0.97 (0.96-0.98) between qPCR methods, 0.80 (0.74-0.85) to 0.94 (0.92-0.96) between virus infectivity assays, and 0.77 (0.68-0.83) to 0.95 (0.93-0.96) between qPCR methods and virus infectivity assays were obtained. These findings show that qPCR gives the highest probability for the detection of ASFV.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Pathogens Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Dinamarca

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Pathogens Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Dinamarca