Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Intraarticular viscosupplementation following arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review.
Tripathy, Sujit Kumar; Varghese, Paulson; Behera, Hrudeswar; Balagod, Raghavendra; Rao, P Bhaskar; Sahoo, Alok Kumar; Panda, Aparajita.
Afiliación
  • Tripathy SK; Dept. of Orthopedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India.
  • Varghese P; Dept. of Orthopedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India.
  • Behera H; Dept. of Orthopedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India.
  • Balagod R; Dept. of Orthopedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India.
  • Rao PB; Dept. of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India.
  • Sahoo AK; Dept. of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India.
  • Panda A; Dept. of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India.
J Clin Orthop Trauma ; 28: 101847, 2022 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35378776
ABSTRACT

Background:

Pain, swelling and joint stiffness are the major problems following arthroscopic ACL reconstruction (ACLR) surgery that restrict early return to sports and athletic activities. The patients often receive prolonged analgesic medications to control the inflammatory response and resume the pre-injury activities. This systematic review aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intraarticular (IA) hyaluronic acid (HA) injection following ACLR. Material and

methods:

A literature search of electronic databases and a manual search of studies reporting clinical effectiveness of IA HA following ACLR was performed on 1st November 2020. The quality of the methodology and risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and Newcastle-Ottawa scale for randomized-controlled trial and prospective cohort studies, respectively.

Results:

Of 324 studies retrieved, four studies (3 RCTs and one prospective cohort study) were found to be suitable for inclusion in this review. These studies had a low to moderate risk of bias. There were 182 patients in the HA group and 121 patients in the control group. The demographic characteristics of the patients were similar in all studies. The pooled analysis of studies evaluating pain at different follow up periods (2-week, 4-6 weeks, 8-12 weeks) after ACLR revealed no significant difference between the HA and control groups (p > 0.05). The knee swelling was significantly less in the HA group at two weeks (MD -7.85, 95% CI [-15.03, -0.68], p = 0.03, I2 = 0%), but no such difference was noted after 4-6 weeks and 8-12 weeks. The functional outcome score was not significantly different between the groups (SMD 0.00, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.38, p = 0.99, I2 = 0%).

Conclusions:

Although the individual study demonstrated a short-term positive response regarding pain control and swelling reduction, the pooled analysis did not find any clinical benefit of IA HA injection following ACLR surgery. Level of evidence II.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Orthop Trauma Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: India

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Orthop Trauma Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: India