Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Endoscopic assessment of radiological stage IVA cervical cancer: A bivariate meta-analysis supporting an evidence-based staging algorithm proposal.
Sapienza, Lucas G; Thomas, Justin J; Showalter, Timothy N; Echeverria, Alfredo E; Ludwig, Michelle S; Chen, Albert C; Jo, Eunji; Calsavara, Vinícius F; Hilsenbeck, Susan G; Jhingran, Anuja; Frumovitz, Michael M; Baiocchi, Glauco.
Afiliación
  • Sapienza LG; Department of Radiation Oncology, Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. Electronic address: lucas.sapienza@bcm.edu.
  • Thomas JJ; Department of Radiation Oncology, Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Showalter TN; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia Cancer Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
  • Echeverria AE; Department of Radiation Oncology, Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Ludwig MS; Department of Radiation Oncology, Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Chen AC; Department of Radiation Oncology, Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Jo E; Biostatistics and Informatics Shared Resource (BISR) Core, Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Calsavara VF; Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Samuel Oschin Cancer Center, Cedars-Sinai, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Hilsenbeck SG; Biostatistics and Informatics Shared Resource (BISR) Core, Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Jhingran A; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Frumovitz MM; Department of Gynecologic Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Baiocchi G; Department of Gynecologic Oncology, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Gynecol Oncol ; 165(3): 642-649, 2022 06.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35410732
OBJECTIVE: To optimize the use of confirmatory endoscopic exams (cystoscopy/proctoscopy) in the staging of locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC), the present study evaluates the predictive value of radiological exams (CT and MRI) to detect bladder/rectum invasion. METHODS: A systematic search of databases (PubMed and EMBASE) was performed (CRD42021270329). The inclusion criteria were: a) cervix cancer diagnosis; b) staging CT and/or MRI (index test); c) staging cystoscopy and/or proctoscopy (standard test); and d) numbers of true positives (TP), true negatives (TN), false positives (FP), and false negatives (FN) provided. A random-effects bivariate meta-analysis of positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) was performed with moderator analyses by imaging modality (CT and MRI) and prevalence. RESULTS: Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria, totaling 3480 and 1641 patients for bladder and rectum analyses, respectively. For bladder invasion (prevalence ranged from 0.9% to 34.5%), the overall PPV was 45% (95% confidence interval, 33%-57%, based on 19 studies). Per subgroup, the PPV was 31% for MRI/prevalence ≤6%, 33% for CT/prevalence ≤6%, and 69% for CT/prevalence >6%. For rectal invasion (prevalence ranged from 0.4% to 20.0%), the overall PPV was 30% (95% confidence interval, 17%-47%, based on 8 studies). Per subgroup, the PPV was 36% for MRI/prevalence ≤1%, 17% for MRI/prevalence >1%, and 38% for CT/prevalence >1%. The overall NPV for bladder invasion and rectal invasion were 98% (95% confidence interval, 97%-99%) and 100% (95% confidence interval, 99%-100%), respectively. Considering prevalence and radiological modality, the point estimate of NPV varied from 95% to 100% for bladder invasion and from 99% to 100% for rectum invasion. CONCLUSIONS: Due to low PPV (<50%) of radiological staging, endoscopic exams may be necessary to correctly assess radiological stage IVA LACC. However, they are not necessary after negative radiological exam (NPV ≥95%).
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Gynecol Oncol Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Gynecol Oncol Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos