Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic about sample access for research in the UK.
Sims, Jessica M; Lawrence, Emma; Glazer, Katy; Gander, Amir; Fuller, Barry; Davidson, Brian R; Garibaldi, Jonathan; Quinlan, Philip R.
Afiliación
  • Sims JM; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
  • Lawrence E; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
  • Glazer K; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
  • Gander A; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
  • Fuller B; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
  • Davidson BR; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
  • Garibaldi J; HPB Surgery, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Quinlan PR; School of Computer Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, UK.
BMJ Open ; 12(4): e047309, 2022 04 15.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35428611
OBJECTIVE: Annotated clinical samples taken from patients are a foundation of translational medical research and give mechanistic insight into drug trials. Prior research by the Tissue Directory and Coordination Centre (TDCC) indicated that researchers, particularly those in industry, face many barriers in accessing patient samples. The arrival of the COVID-19 pandemic to the UK produced an immediate and extreme shockwave, which impacted on the ability to undertake all crucial translational research. As a national coordination centre, the TDCC is tasked with improving efficiency in the biobanking sector. Thus, we took responsibility to identify and coordinate UK tissue sample collection organisations (biobanks) able to collect COVID-19-related samples for researchers between March and September 2020. FINDINGS: Almost a third of UK biobanks were closed during the first wave of the UK COVID-19 pandemic. Of the remainder, 43% had limited capabilities while 26% maintained normal activity. Of the nationally prioritised COVID-19 interventional studies, just three of the five that responded to questioning were collecting human samples. Of the 41 requests for COVID-19 samples received by the TDCC, only four could be fulfilled due to a lack of UK coordinated strategy. Meanwhile, in the background there are numerous reports that sample collections in the UK remain largely underutilised. CONCLUSION: The response to a pandemic demands high level co-ordinated research responses to reduce mortality. Our study highlights the lack of efficiency and coordination between human sample collections and clinical trials across the UK. UK sample access is not working for researchers, clinicians or patients. A radical change is required in the strategy for sample collection and distribution to maximise this valuable resource of human-donated samples.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: COVID-19 Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Aspecto: Ethics Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: COVID-19 Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Aspecto: Ethics Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Reino Unido