Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Contralateral and Lateral Views: Analysis of the Technical Aspects of Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Insertion.
Gill, Jatinder; Kohan, Lynn; Hasoon, Jamal; Urits, Ivan; Viswanath, Omar; Sadegi, Kambiz; Orhurhu, Vwaire; Lee, Anthony C; Aner, Musa M; Simopoulos, Thomas T.
Afiliación
  • Gill J; Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Kohan L; Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
  • Hasoon J; Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Urits I; Pain Specialists of America, Austin, TX, USA.
  • Viswanath O; Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Sadegi K; Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, USA.
  • Orhurhu V; Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, USA.
  • Lee AC; Valley Anesthesiology and Pain Consultants, Envision Physician Services, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
  • Aner MM; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Arizona College of Medicine Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
  • Simopoulos TT; Department of Anesthesiology, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA.
Anesth Pain Med ; 12(1): e123357, 2022 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35433387
ABSTRACT

Background:

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an established treatment modality for neuropathic pain. The critical part of this technique is safe access to the epidural space for lead placement. There have been innovations in radiological views, improving access to the epidural space.

Objectives:

This study analyzes the adoption of these technical advantages in daily practice.

Methods:

We conducted a survey of members in the Spine Intervention Society and American Society of Regional Anesthesia in regard to the practice patterns in SCS therapy. Here we present our findings regarding the use of contralateral oblique (CLO) and lateral views as well direct upper thoracic or cervicothoracic access for SCS lead insertion.

Results:

A total of 195 unique responses were received between March 20, 2020 and June 26, 2020. Forty-five percent of respondents "always used" the lateral view technique while 15% "always used" CLO view for SCS lead insertion. Overall, sixty-five percent of respondents used the CLO view with varying frequency. Cervical and upper thoracic approach for cervical SCS lead placement is always or often used by 66.8% of the respondents.

Conclusions:

A depth view (CLO or lateral) is always used by only 45 - 60% of the respondents and CLO view has been rapidly adopted in clinical practice for SCS lead insertion. Direct cervicothoracic and upper thoracic is the preferred approach for cervical lead placement by the majority.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Anesth Pain Med Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Anesth Pain Med Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos