Microhaplotype and Y-SNP/STR (MY): A novel MPS-based system for genotype pattern recognition in two-person DNA mixtures.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUNDS Y-chromosomal haplotypes based on Y-short tandem repeats (STRs) and Y-single nucleotide polymorphisms/insertion and deletion polymorphisms (SNPs/InDels) are used to characterize paternal lineages of unknown male trace donors. However, Y-chromosomal genetic markers are not currently sufficient for precise individual identification. Microhaplotype (MH), generally < 200 bp on autosomes and consisting of two or more SNPs, was recently introduced in forensic genetics with the development of massive parallel sequencing technology and may facilitate identification and DNA mixture deconvolution. Therefore, combining the two kinds of genetic markers may be beneficial in many forensic scenarios, especially crime scenes with male suspects, such as sexual assault cases. METHODS: In the present study, we developed a novel MPS-based panel, Microhaplotype and Y-SNP/STR (MY), by multiplex PCR and 150-bp paired-end sequencing, including 114 Y-SNPs (twelve dominant Y-DNA haplogroups), 45 Y-STRs (N-1 stutter < 0.09; estimated mutation rate < 5 × 10-3), and 22 MHs (allele coverage ratio > 0.91; pairwise distance > 10 Mb). Additionally, MY system-based genotype pattern recognition (GPR), a regression-based method to identify the genotype pattern for each MH locus, is proposed for two-person DNA mixture deconvolution. We integrated 26 two-person genotype combinations into nine genotype patterns and validated the application range of GPR based on DNA profiles of ten sets of simulated male-male DNA mixtures (110-12). RESULTS: The effective number of alleles (Ae) ranged from 3.62 to 14.72, with an average of 7.17, in 100 Chinese Guangdong Han individuals. The cumulative discrimination power was 1-5.00 × 10-31, and the cumulative power of exclusion was 1-5.00 × 10-8 and 1-4.85 × 10-12 for duo and trio paternity testing, respectively. Furthermore, the actual mixing ratio-depth of coverage (DoC) ratio (RDoC) regression relationships were established for different genetic markers and genotype patterns. In five overlapping areas, genotype differentiation of the major and minor contributors required likelihood ratio methods. In nonoverlapping areas, the genotype pattern could be recognized by comparing the observed RDoC and RDoC ranges. CONCLUSION: The GPR can be used to deconvolute two-person DNA mixtures (application range 110-12) for individual identification.