Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Criteria for developing, assessing and selecting candidate EQ-5D bolt-ons.
Mulhern, Brendan J; Sampson, Chris; Haywood, Phil; Addo, Rebecca; Page, Katie; Mott, David; Shah, Koonal; Janssen, Mathieu F; Herdman, Mike.
Afiliación
  • Mulhern BJ; Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia. brendan.mulhern@uts.edu.au.
  • Sampson C; Office of Health Economics, London, UK.
  • Haywood P; Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
  • Addo R; Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
  • Page K; Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
  • Mott D; Office of Health Economics, London, UK.
  • Shah K; PHMR, London, UK.
  • Janssen MF; National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, UK.
  • Herdman M; EuroQol Research Foundation, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Qual Life Res ; 31(10): 3041-3048, 2022 Oct.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35486216
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

'Bolt-on' dimensions are additional items added to multi-attribute utility instruments (MAUIs) such as EQ-5D that measure constructs not included in the core descriptive system. The use of bolt-ons has been proposed to improve the content validity and responsiveness of the descriptive system in certain settings and health conditions. EQ-5D bolt-ons serve a particular purpose and thus satisfy a certain set of criteria. The aim of this paper is to propose a set of criteria to guide the development, assessment and selection of candidate bolt-on descriptors.

METHODS:

Criteria were developed using an iterative approach. First, existing criteria were identified from the literature including those used to guide the development of MAUIs, the COSMIN checklist and reviews of existing bolt-ons. Second, processes used to develop bolt-ons based on qualitative and quantitative approaches were considered. The information from these two stages was formalised into draft development and selection criteria. These were reviewed by the project team and iteratively refined.

RESULTS:

Overall, 23 criteria for the development, assessment and selection of candidate bolt-ons were formulated. Development criteria focused on issues relating to i) structure, ii) language, and iii) consistency with the existing EQ-5D dimension structure. Assessment and selection criteria focused on face and content validity and classical psychometric indicators.

CONCLUSION:

The criteria generated can be used to guide the development of bolt-ons across different health areas. They can also be used to assess existing bolt-ons, and inform their inclusion in studies and patient groups where the EQ-5D may lack content validity.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Calidad de Vida / Estado de Salud Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude / Patient_preference Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Qual Life Res Asunto de la revista: REABILITACAO / TERAPEUTICA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Calidad de Vida / Estado de Salud Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude / Patient_preference Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Qual Life Res Asunto de la revista: REABILITACAO / TERAPEUTICA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia