Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cultivating a communities of practice for colorectal cancer screening in northern Canada.
Smith, H A; Kuziemsky, C; Champion, C; Fung-Kee-Fung, M; Boushey, R; Kandola, K; Tessier, A.
Afiliación
  • Smith HA; Telfer School of Management University of Ottawa, 55 Laurier Ave E, Ottawa, ON, Canada. Electronic address: hsmit037@uottawa.ca.
  • Kuziemsky C; Office of Research Services, MacEwan University, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
  • Champion C; Division of General Surgery, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Sudbury, ON, Canada.
  • Fung-Kee-Fung M; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
  • Boushey R; Division of General Surgery, University of Ottawa, ON, Canada.
  • Kandola K; Office of the Chief Public Health Officer, Department of Health and Social Services, Yellowknife, NWT, Canada.
  • Tessier A; Department of General Surgery, Northwest Territories Health and Social Services Association, Yellowknife, NWT, Canada.
J Cancer Policy ; 28: 100274, 2021 06.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35559904
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Knowledge management systems such as a Communities of Practice (CoP) can improve healthcare processes but are challenging in complex multidisciplinary systems, and guidance on methods to establish a CoP are needed. This case illustrates the use of early stakeholder engagement and Nominal Group Technique (NGT) to cultivate a CoP in a complex multidisciplinary system colorectal cancer screening in northern Canada.

METHODS:

Stakeholders in the Northwest Territories, Canada were recruited and co-designed a workshop with authors to introduce CoP concepts and identify priorities. At the workshop NGT was used to identify and prioritize gaps in process, practice, and evidence for the CoP to focus on. An anonymous polling system was used to obtain workshop participants' feedback on the process.

RESULTS:

The co-design process integrated stakeholders' perspectives in developing a workshop. Using NGT, the gap analysis identified 23 areas of focus for the CoP, among which, the highest priorities were identified communication between clinicians and with patients, and identification of screening eligibility in the electronic medical record. Participants found the process to be useful, educational, and interesting. There was unanimous interest in moving forward with developing a CoP.

CONCLUSION:

A co-designed workshop and NGT were useful in laying the foundation for a CoP in a complex multidisciplinary environment. POLICY STATEMENT This case shows the utility of a co-designed workshop and NGT in starting a CoP a knowledge management system that would provide critical insight into colorectal cancer screening policies for the region.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Colorrectales / Detección Precoz del Cáncer Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Cancer Policy Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Colorrectales / Detección Precoz del Cáncer Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Cancer Policy Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article