Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessing the rate of torque development in sprint cycling: a methodological study.
Connolly, Shannon; Peeling, Peter; Binnie, Martyn J; Goods, Paul S R; Blazevich, Anthony J; Timmerman, Wouter P; Abbiss, Chris R.
Afiliación
  • Connolly S; Centre for Human Performance, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia.
  • Peeling P; Western Australian Institute of Sport, Mount Claremont, Australia.
  • Binnie MJ; Western Australian Institute of Sport, Mount Claremont, Australia.
  • Goods PSR; School of Human Sciences (Exercise and Sport Science), The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia.
  • Blazevich AJ; Western Australian Institute of Sport, Mount Claremont, Australia.
  • Timmerman WP; School of Human Sciences (Exercise and Sport Science), The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia.
  • Abbiss CR; Western Australian Institute of Sport, Mount Claremont, Australia.
Eur J Sport Sci ; 23(6): 964-974, 2023 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35581926
ABSTRACT
The present study examined (i) the magnitude of the rate of torque development (RTD) and (ii) the between-day reliability of RTD at the start of a cycling sprint when sprint resistance, sprint duration, and the pedal downstroke were altered. Nineteen well-trained cyclists completed one familiarisation and three testing sessions. Each session involved one set of 1-s sprints and one set of 5-s sprints. Each set contained one moderate (0.3 N m kg-1), one heavy (0.6 N m kg-1), and one very heavy (1.0 N m kg-1) resistance sprint. RTD measures (average and peak RTD, RTD 0-100 ms, and RTD 0-200 ms) were calculated for downstroke 1 in the 1-s sprint. For the 5-s sprints, RTD measures were calculated for each of the first three downstrokes, as an average of downstrokes 1 and 2, and as an average of downstrokes 2 and 3. Whilst RTDs were greatest in downstroke 3 at all resistances, the greatest number of reliable RTD measures were obtained using the average of downstrokes 2 and 3 with heavy or very heavy resistances, where average and peak RTD, and RTD 0-200 ms were deemed reliable (ICC ≥ 0.8, CV ≤ 10%). Since only 1-2 downstrokes can be completed within 1 s, the greatest RTD reliability cannot be achieved using a 1-s sprint; therefore, the average of downstrokes 2 and 3 during a >2-s cycling sprint (e.g. 5-s test) with heavy or very heavy resistance is recommended for the assessment of RTD in sprint cyclists.HighlightsWhilst RTD measures were greatest in pedal downstroke 3 at all resistances, the greatest number of reliable RTD measures were obtained using the average of pedal downstrokes 2 and 3 with heavy or very heavy resistances, with average and peak RTD, and RTD 0-200 ms having acceptable reliability.RTD 0-100 ms and all RTD measurements for downstroke 1 were not reliable and should not be used. As only 1-2 downstrokes can be performed in 1 s, the greatest RTD reliability cannot be achieved using a 1-s sprint. Instead, RTD may be evaluated using a 5-s sprint.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ciclismo / Prueba de Esfuerzo Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Sport Sci Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ciclismo / Prueba de Esfuerzo Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Sport Sci Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia