Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Slow improvement to the archiving quality of open datasets shared by researchers in ecology and evolution.
Roche, Dominique G; Berberi, Ilias; Dhane, Fares; Lauzon, Félix; Soeharjono, Sandrine; Dakin, Roslyn; Binning, Sandra A.
Afiliación
  • Roche DG; Department of Biology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1S 5B6.
  • Berberi I; Département de science biologiques, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada H3C 3J7.
  • Dhane F; Institut de Biologie, Université de Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel 2000, Switzerland.
  • Lauzon F; Department of Biology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1S 5B6.
  • Soeharjono S; Département de science biologiques, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada H3C 3J7.
  • Dakin R; Département de science biologiques, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada H3C 3J7.
  • Binning SA; Department of Biology, McGill University, Montréal, Canada H3A 1B1.
Proc Biol Sci ; 289(1975): 20212780, 2022 05 25.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35582791
Many leading journals in ecology and evolution now mandate open data upon publication. Yet, there is very little oversight to ensure the completeness and reusability of archived datasets, and we currently have a poor understanding of the factors associated with high-quality data sharing. We assessed 362 open datasets linked to first- or senior-authored papers published by 100 principal investigators (PIs) in the fields of ecology and evolution over a period of 7 years to identify predictors of data completeness and reusability (data archiving quality). Datasets scored low on these metrics: 56.4% were complete and 45.9% were reusable. Data reusability, but not completeness, was slightly higher for more recently archived datasets and PIs with less seniority. Journal open data policy, PI gender and PI corresponding author status were unrelated to data archiving quality. However, PI identity explained a large proportion of the variance in data completeness (27.8%) and reusability (22.0%), indicating consistent inter-individual differences in data sharing practices by PIs across time and contexts. Several PIs consistently shared data of either high or low archiving quality, but most PIs were inconsistent in how well they shared. One explanation for the high intra-individual variation we observed is that PIs often conduct research through students and postdoctoral researchers, who may be responsible for the data collection, curation and archiving. Levels of data literacy vary among trainees and PIs may not regularly perform quality control over archived files. Our findings suggest that research data management training and culture within a PI's group are likely to be more important determinants of data archiving quality than other factors such as a journal's open data policy. Greater incentives and training for individual researchers at all career stages could improve data sharing practices and enhance data transparency and reusability.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Difusión de la Información / Ecología Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Proc Biol Sci Asunto de la revista: BIOLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Difusión de la Información / Ecología Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Proc Biol Sci Asunto de la revista: BIOLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Reino Unido