Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Bivalirudin versus heparin anticoagulation in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
Huang, Daochao; Guan, QiongChan; Qin, Jie; Shan, Renfei; Wu, Jinhong; Zhang, Chuang.
Afiliación
  • Huang D; Emergency department, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang province affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China.
  • Guan Q; Emergency department, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang province affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China.
  • Qin J; Emergency department, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang province affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China.
  • Shan R; Emergency department, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang province affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China.
  • Wu J; Obstetrics and gynecology department, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang province affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China.
  • Zhang C; Emergency department, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang province affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China.
Perfusion ; 38(6): 1133-1141, 2023 09.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35616224
OBJECTIVE: Bivalirudin has been suggested as an alternative to heparin for anticoagulation in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Nevertheless, there is limited evidence about the benefit of bivalirudin in ECMO patients compared with heparin. Hence, we conducted a meta-analysis to assess the effect of bivalirudin versus heparin on clinical outcomes in patients receiving ECMO. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched from inception up to 1 April 2022 for cohort studies and randomized controlled trials comparing bivalirudin versus heparin in patients who received ECMO. The primary outcome was short-term death. Secondary outcomes included thrombotic events and bleeding events. RESULTS: We selected 12 retrospective cohort studies with 1232 ECMO patients focusing on bivalirudin anticoagulation (n = 497) versus heparin anticoagulation (n = 735). Two hundred and one of 497 patients (40.4%) in the bivalirudin group versus 350 of 735 patients (47.6%) in the heparin group did not survive to hospital discharge. Compared with the heparin group, bivalirudin anticoagulation did not significantly decrease in-hospital mortality in patients receiving ECMO (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.79-1.13; p = 0.546). Fifty-seven of 374 patients (15.2%) in the bivalirudin versus 99 of 381 patients (26.0%) in the heparin group suffered from thrombotic events. Compared with the heparin group, bivalirudin anticoagulation did not significantly decrease the rate of thrombotic events for patients receiving ECMO (RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.45-1.35; p = 0.378). However, bivalirudin anticoagulation significantly decreased the incidence of bleeding events compared to the heparin group (RR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.25-0.95; p = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with heparin anticoagulation, bivalirudin did not decrease the rates of short-term mortality and thrombotic events, but reduced the incidence of bleeding events in patients receiving ECMO.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trombosis / Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Perfusion Asunto de la revista: CARDIOLOGIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trombosis / Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Perfusion Asunto de la revista: CARDIOLOGIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China Pais de publicación: Reino Unido