Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Toxicity analysis of busulfan pharmacokinetic therapeutic dose monitoring.
Gaffney, Kelly J; Urban, Theresa A; Lucena, Mariana; Anwer, Faiz; Dean, Robert M; Gerds, Aaron T; Hamilton, Betty K; Jagadeesh, Deepa; Kalaycio, Matt E; Khouri, Jack; Pohlman, Brad; Sobecks, Ronald; Winter, Allison; Rybicki, Lisa; Majhail, Navneet S; Hill, Brian T.
Afiliación
  • Gaffney KJ; 2345Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
  • Urban TA; 2569Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Lucena M; Medexus Pharmaceuticals, Bolton, Canada.
  • Anwer F; 2569Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Dean RM; 2569Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Gerds AT; 2569Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Hamilton BK; 2569Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Jagadeesh D; 2569Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Kalaycio ME; 2569Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Khouri J; 2569Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Pohlman B; 2569Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Sobecks R; 2569Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Winter A; 2569Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Rybicki L; 2569Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Majhail NS; Sarah Cannon Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Hill BT; 2569Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; : 10781552221104422, 2022 Jun 07.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35673764
Busulfan-based conditioning regimens are associated with serious toxicities and literature reports increased risk of toxicities when daily area under the curve concentrations exceed 6000 µM-minute. We implemented real time pharmacokinetic-guided therapeutic drug monitoring of busulfan for myeloablative conditioning regimens. The objective was to compare toxicity of intravenous busulfan before and after therapeutic drug monitoring implementation. The primary endpoint was incidence of hepatotoxicity. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed with weight-based dose Busulfan/Cyclophosphamide (BuCy) conditioning from August 2017 through March 2018 (N = 14) and therapeutic drug monitoring from April 2018 through December 2018 (N = 22). Recipients of busulfan therapeutic drug monitoring were younger than those receiving weight-based dose (median: 45 vs. 58 years, p = 0.008). No other baseline differences were observed. There was no difference in hepatotoxicity between therapeutic drug monitoring and weight-based dose (median 1 vs. 0 days, p = 0.40). In the therapeutic drug monitoring group, 45% of patients had increases and 41% had decreases in busulfan dose after Bu1. Repeat pharmacokinetic after Bu2 were required in 32% of patients. A pharmacokinetic dose monitoring program for myeloablative conditioning intravenous busulfan regimens may be considered a safe practice in stem cell transplant recipients. The majority of patients receiving pharmacokinetic-guided therapeutic drug monitoring required dose changes and therapeutic drug monitoring patients had no significant difference in toxicity compared to those receiving weight-based dose.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Oncol Pharm Pract Asunto de la revista: FARMACIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Oncol Pharm Pract Asunto de la revista: FARMACIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido