Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Early versus delayed complete revascularisation in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Abouelmagd, Khaled; Tayel, Hesham; Atta, Ashraf; Ladwiniec, Andrew; Ibrahim, Mokhtar.
Afiliación
  • Abouelmagd K; Cardiology Department, Al-Azhar University, New Damietta, Egypt.
  • Tayel H; Cardiology Department, Menoufia University, Shebin El-Kom, Egypt.
  • Atta A; Cardiology Department, Minia University, El Minia, Egypt.
  • Ladwiniec A; Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
  • Ibrahim M; Cardiology Department, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK mokhtar.ibrahim@uhl-tr.nhs.uk.
Open Heart ; 9(1)2022 06.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35728889
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Several studies have demonstrated that complete revascularisation improves clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary disease. However, the optimal timing of non-culprit lesion revascularisation remains controversial.

OBJECTIVE:

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the effect of timing of complete revascularisation on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with STEMI and multivessel coronary artery disease.

METHODS:

Searches of PubMed, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov and the reference lists of relevant papers were conducted covering the period from 2004 to 2019. A pairwise analysis was performed to compare the difference in clinical outcome between early complete revascularisation (index procedure or index hospitalisation) and delayed complete revascularisation (after discharge) in patients with STEMI.The primary endpoint was the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), which was defined as the composite of all-cause mortality, recurrent myocardial infarction, unplanned repeated revascularisation and cardiovascular death.

RESULTS:

Twelve studies including a total of 7596 patients were identified. The MACE rate was 10.37% in early complete revascularisation compared with 18.17% in culprit only (p=0.01). When complete revascularisation was delayed, the MACE rate was 11.81% after complete revascularisation compared with 17.21% in culprit-only percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (p=0.01). A meta-regression analysis demonstrated no relationship between timing of complete revascularisation and reduction in MACE relative to culprit-only PCI (p=0.862).

CONCLUSION:

In patients with STEMI treated by primary PCI and multivessel disease, there is a benefit of complete revascularisation over culprit-only PCI whether non-culprit revascularisation is performed early in hospital or delayed as an elective procedure. We have not demonstrated a relationship between timing of complete revascularisation and MACE. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42021226789.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria / Intervención Coronaria Percutánea / Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Open Heart Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Egipto

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria / Intervención Coronaria Percutánea / Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Open Heart Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Egipto