Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Ureteroscopy with thulium fiber laser lithotripsy results in shorter operating times and large cost savings.
Ryan, James R; Nguyen, Mitchell H; Linscott, Joshua A; Nowicki, Samuel W; James, Evelyn; Jumper, Brian M; Ordoñez, Maria; Ingimarsson, Johann P.
Afiliación
  • Ryan JR; Tufts University School of Medicine, 145 Harrison Ave, Boston, MA, 02111, USA. jryan1@mmc.org.
  • Nguyen MH; Division of Urology, Maine Medical Center, 100 Brickhill Ave, South Portland, ME, 04106, USA.
  • Linscott JA; Division of Urology, Maine Medical Center, 100 Brickhill Ave, South Portland, ME, 04106, USA.
  • Nowicki SW; Tufts University School of Medicine, 145 Harrison Ave, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.
  • James E; Brown School of Public Health, 121 South Main Street, Providence, RI, USA.
  • Jumper BM; Division of Urology, Maine Medical Center, 100 Brickhill Ave, South Portland, ME, 04106, USA.
  • Ordoñez M; Division of Urology, Maine Medical Center, 100 Brickhill Ave, South Portland, ME, 04106, USA.
  • Ingimarsson JP; Division of Urology, Maine Medical Center, 100 Brickhill Ave, South Portland, ME, 04106, USA.
World J Urol ; 40(8): 2077-2082, 2022 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35729369
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Prolonged ureteroscopy (URS) is associated with complications including ureteral perforation, stricture, and urosepsis. As laser lithotripsy is one of the most common urologic procedures, small cost savings per case can have a large financial impact. This retrospective study was designed to determine if Thulium fiber laser (TFL) lithotripsy decreases operative time and costs compared to standard HolmiumYAG (HoYAG) lithotripsy without pulse modulation.

METHODS:

A retrospective review of URS with laser lithotripsy was conducted for 152 cases performed from August 2020 to January 2021. Variables including cumulative stone size, location, chemical composition, prior ureteral stenting, and ureteral access sheath use were recorded for each case. A cost benefit analysis was performed to show projected cost savings due to potentially decreased operative times.

RESULTS:

Compared to HoYAG, use of TFL resulted in an average decrease of 12.9 min per case (p = .021, 95% CI [2.03-23.85]). In subgroup analysis of cases with cumulative stone diameter less than 15 mm, the difference was 14.0 min (p = .007, CI [3.95-23.95]). For cases less than 10 mm, the mean difference was 17.3 min in favor of TFL (p = .002, 95% CI [6.89-27.62]). This ~ 13 min reduction in operative time resulted in saving $440/case in direct operating room costs giving our institution a range of $294,000 to $381,900 savings per year.

CONCLUSIONS:

TFL has a significantly shorter operative time and decreased cost when compared to the standard HoYAG for equivalent kidney stone and patient characteristics. Longer term follow up is needed to see if recurrence rates are affected.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Litotricia / Cálculos Ureterales / Litotripsia por Láser / Láseres de Estado Sólido Tipo de estudio: Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: World J Urol Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Litotricia / Cálculos Ureterales / Litotripsia por Láser / Láseres de Estado Sólido Tipo de estudio: Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: World J Urol Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos
...