Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Development of a General Health Score Based on 12 Objective Metabolic and Lifestyle Items: The Lifestyle and Well-Being Index.
Pano, Octavio; Sayón-Orea, Carmen; Hershey, María Soledad; Bes-Rastrollo, Maira; Martínez-González, Miguel A; Martínez, J Alfredo.
Afiliación
  • Pano O; Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, School of Medicine, Universidad de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain.
  • Sayón-Orea C; Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, School of Medicine, Universidad de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain.
  • Hershey MS; Navarra Institute for Health Research, IdiSNA, 31008 Pamplona, Spain.
  • Bes-Rastrollo M; Navarra Public Health Institute, 31003 Navarra, Spain.
  • Martínez-González MA; Área de Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y la Nutrición, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (CIBEROBN), 28049 Madrid, Spain.
  • Martínez JA; Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, School of Medicine, Universidad de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain.
Healthcare (Basel) ; 10(6)2022 Jun 11.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35742139
ABSTRACT
Healthy and unhealthy lifestyles are tightly linked to general health and well-being. However, measurements of well-being have failed to include elements of health and easy to interpret information for patients seeking to improve lifestyles. Therefore, this study aimed to create an index for the assessment of general health and well-being along with two cut-off points the lifestyle and well-being index (LWB-I). This was a cross-sectional analysis of 15,168 individuals. Internally valid multivariate linear models were constructed using key lifestyle features predicting a modified Short Form 36 questionnaire (SF-36) and used to score the LWB-I. Categorization of the LWB-I was based on self-perceived health (SPH) and analyzed using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Optimal cut-points identified individuals with poor and excellent SPH. Lifestyle and well-being were adequately accounted for using 12 lifestyle items. SPH groups had increasingly healthier lifestyle features and LWB-I scores; optimal cut-point for poor SPH were scores below 80 points (AUC 0.80 (0.79, 0.82); sensitivity 75.7%, specificity 72.3%)) and above 86 points for excellent SPH (AUC 0.67 (0.66, 0.69); sensitivity 61.4%, specificity 63.3%). Lifestyle and well-being were quantitatively scored based on their associations with a general health measure in order to create the LWB-I along with two cut points.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Idioma: En Revista: Healthcare (Basel) Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: España

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Idioma: En Revista: Healthcare (Basel) Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: España