Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Transthoracic, thoracoabdominal, and transabdominal surgical approaches for gastric cardia adenocarcinomas: a survival evaluation based on a cohort of 7103 patients.
Chen, Yao; Zhao, Xue Ke; Xu, Rui Hua; Song, Xin; Yang, Miao Miao; Zhou, Fu You; Lei, Ling Ling; Fan, Zong Min; Han, Xue Na; Gao, She Gan; Wang, Xian Zeng; Liu, Zhi Cai; Li Li, Ai; Gao, Wen Jun; Hu, Jing Feng; Zhang, Li Guo; Wei, Jin Chang; Jiao, Fu Lin; Zhong, Kan; Wang, Wei Peng; Li, Liu Yu; Ji, Jia Jia; Li, Xue Min; Wang, Li Dong.
Afiliación
  • Chen Y; State Key Laboratory of Esophageal Cancer Prevention & Treatment and Henan Key Laboratory for Esophageal Cancer Research of The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan Province, China.
  • Zhao XK; State Key Laboratory of Esophageal Cancer Prevention & Treatment and Henan Key Laboratory for Esophageal Cancer Research of The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan Province, China.
  • Xu RH; State Key Laboratory of Esophageal Cancer Prevention & Treatment and Henan Key Laboratory for Esophageal Cancer Research of The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan Province, China.
  • Song X; State Key Laboratory of Esophageal Cancer Prevention & Treatment and Henan Key Laboratory for Esophageal Cancer Research of The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan Province, China.
  • Yang MM; State Key Laboratory of Esophageal Cancer Prevention & Treatment and Henan Key Laboratory for Esophageal Cancer Research of The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan Province, China.
  • Zhou FY; Department of Thoracic Surgery, Anyang Tumor Hospital, Anyang, Henan Province, China.
  • Lei LL; State Key Laboratory of Esophageal Cancer Prevention & Treatment and Henan Key Laboratory for Esophageal Cancer Research of The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan Province, China.
  • Fan ZM; State Key Laboratory of Esophageal Cancer Prevention & Treatment and Henan Key Laboratory for Esophageal Cancer Research of The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan Province, China.
  • Han XN; State Key Laboratory of Esophageal Cancer Prevention & Treatment and Henan Key Laboratory for Esophageal Cancer Research of The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan Province, China.
  • Gao SG; Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, Henan Province, China.
  • Wang XZ; Department of Thoracic Surgery, Linzhou People's Hospital, Linzhou, Henan Province, China.
  • Liu ZC; Department of Oncology, Tumor Hospital of Linzhou, Linzhou, Henan Province, China.
  • Li Li A; Department of Oncology, Tumor Hospital of Linzhou, Linzhou, Henan Province, China.
  • Gao WJ; Department of Thoracic Surgery, Linzhou People's Hospital, Linzhou, Henan Province, China.
  • Hu JF; State Key Laboratory of Esophageal Cancer Prevention & Treatment and Henan Key Laboratory for Esophageal Cancer Research of The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan Province, China.
  • Zhang LG; Department of Thoracic Surgery, Central Hospital of Xinxiang, Xinxiang, Henan Province, China.
  • Wei JC; Department of Pathology and Thoracic Surgery, Linzhou Esophageal Cancer Hospital, Linzhou, Henan Province, China.
  • Jiao FL; Department of Pathology and Thoracic Surgery, Linzhou Esophageal Cancer Hospital, Linzhou, Henan Province, China.
  • Zhong K; State Key Laboratory of Esophageal Cancer Prevention & Treatment and Henan Key Laboratory for Esophageal Cancer Research of The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan Province, China.
  • Wang WP; Department of Pathology and Thoracic Surgery, Centre for Health Screening and Endoscopy, Cixian People's Hospital, Cixian, Hebei Province, China.
  • Li LY; State Key Laboratory of Esophageal Cancer Prevention & Treatment and Henan Key Laboratory for Esophageal Cancer Research of The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan Province, China.
  • Ji JJ; State Key Laboratory of Esophageal Cancer Prevention & Treatment and Henan Key Laboratory for Esophageal Cancer Research of The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan Province, China.
  • Li XM; Department of Pathology and Thoracic Surgery, Centre for Health Screening and Endoscopy, Cixian People's Hospital, Cixian, Hebei Province, China.
  • Wang LD; State Key Laboratory of Esophageal Cancer Prevention & Treatment and Henan Key Laboratory for Esophageal Cancer Research of The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan Province, China. ldwang@zzu.edu.cn.
World J Surg Oncol ; 20(1): 217, 2022 Jun 28.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35764996
BACKGROUND: This study compared the survival outcomes of different surgical approaches to determine the optimal approach for gastric cardia adenocarcinoma (GCA) and aimed to standardize the surgical treatment guidelines for GCA. METHODS: A total of 7103 patients with GCA were enrolled from our previously established gastric cardia and esophageal carcinoma databases. In our database, when the epicenter of the tumor was at or within 2 cm distally from the esophagogastric junction, the adenocarcinoma was considered to originate from the cardia and was considered a Siewert type 2 cancer. The main criteria for the enrolled patients included treatment with radical surgery, no radio- or chemotherapy before the operation, and detailed clinicopathological information. Follow-up was mainly performed by telephone or through home interviews. According to the medical records, the surgical approaches included transthoracic, thoracoabdominal, and transabdominal approaches. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression models were applied to correlate the surgical approach with survival in patients with GCA. RESULTS: There were marked differences in age and tumor stage among the patients who underwent the three surgical approaches (P < 0.001). Univariate analysis showed that survival was related to sex, age, tumor stage, and N stage (P < 0.001 for all). Cox regression model analysis revealed that thoracoabdominal approach (P < 0.001) and transabdominal approach (P < 0.001) were significant risk factors for poor survival. GCA patients treated with the transthoracic approach had the best survival (5-year survival rate of 53.7%), and survival varied among the different surgical approaches for different tumor stages. CONCLUSION: Thoracoabdominal approach and transabdominal approach were shown to be poor prognostic factors. Patients with (locally advanced) GCA may benefit from the transthoracic approach. Further prospective randomized clinical trials are necessary.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Gástricas / Neoplasias Esofágicas / Adenocarcinoma Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: World J Surg Oncol Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Gástricas / Neoplasias Esofágicas / Adenocarcinoma Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: World J Surg Oncol Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China Pais de publicación: Reino Unido