Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Hypogonadism Associated With Higher Rate of Penile Prosthesis Infection: An Analysis of United States Claims Data.
Patel, Darshan P; Horns, Joshua J; Pastuszak, Alexander W; Hsieh, Tung-Chin; Yafi, Faysal A; Hotaling, James M.
Afiliación
  • Patel DP; Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA.
  • Horns JJ; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT; Surgical Population Analysis Research Core, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
  • Pastuszak AW; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
  • Hsieh TC; Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA.
  • Yafi FA; Department of Urology, University of California Irvine, Orange, CA.
  • Hotaling JM; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT. Electronic address: jim.hotaling@hsc.utah.edu.
Urology ; 167: 132-137, 2022 09.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35768026
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To understand the relationship between hypogonadism and penile prosthesis infection risk.

METHODS:

We performed a retrospective analysis using IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters database. We identified men with ED diagnosis who underwent penile prosthesis placement from 1/1/2008 to 12/31/2017. Comorbidities and risk factors were identified along with a diagnosis of hypogonadism. After placement of penile prosthesis, men were followed until date of surgery of penile prosthesis explant due to infection. Cox proportional hazards models from time of penile prosthesis surgery to date of infection adjusting for various known confounding factors were run.

RESULTS:

We identified 16,660 men who had received penile prosthesis during the study period. 4,832 (29.0%) men had a hypogonadism diagnosis at the time of their initial surgery date. There were 421 (2.5%) device infections requiring explanation. Descriptively, a higher percentage of infections were noted for removal and replacement surgeries compared to primary implants. Hypogonadism was independently associated with a 25.8% higher risk of penile prosthesis infection (HR 1.258, 95% CI 1.024-1.546). Among those men who received testosterone therapy for hypogonadism (prescription data within 0-30 days and within 0-90 days of their initial implant surgery), the effect of hypogonadism on infection risk was no longer significant.

CONCLUSIONS:

Untreated hypogonadism was associated with a 26% higher risk of penile prosthesis infection. This association was most pronounced in men undergoing removal and replacement surgery, which likely drives this association. This suggests a possible benefit to testosterone therapy in testosterone deficient men prior to penile implant, specifically in men undergoing revision.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermedades del Pene / Prótesis de Pene / Implantación de Pene / Hipogonadismo / Disfunción Eréctil Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Urology Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermedades del Pene / Prótesis de Pene / Implantación de Pene / Hipogonadismo / Disfunción Eréctil Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Urology Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá
...