Medial congruent polyethylene design show different tibiofemoral kinematics and enhanced congruency compared to a standard symmetrical cruciate retaining design for total knee arthroplasty-an in vivo randomized controlled study of gait using dynamic radiostereometry.

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: New total knee arthroplasty implant designs attempt to normalize kinematics patterns that may improve functional performance and patient satisfaction. It was hypothesized that a more medial congruent (MC) anatomic bearing design (1) influences the tibiofemoral kinematics and (2) enhances articular congruency compared to a standard symmetrical cruciate retaining (CR) bearing design. METHODS: In this double-blinded randomized study, 66 patients with knee osteoarthritis were randomly included in two groups MC (n = 31) and CR (n = 33). Clinical characteristics such as knee ligament lesions and knee osteoarthritis scores were graded on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and radiography. At the 1-year follow-up, dynamic radiostereometric analysis was used to assess tibiofemoral joint kinematics and articulation congruency. Patient-reported outcome measures, Oxford Knee Score, the Forgotten Joint Score, and the Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, were assessed preoperatively and at the 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: Compared to the CR bearing, the MC bearing displayed an offset with approximately 3 mm greater anterior tibial drawer (p < 0.001) during the entire motion, and up to approximately 3.5 degrees more tibial external rotation (p = 0.004) from mid-swing to the end of the gait cycle at the 1-year follow-up. Furthermore, the congruency area in the joint articulation was larger during approximately 80% of the gait cycle for the MC bearing compared to the CR. The patient-reported outcome measures improved (p < 0.001), but there were no differences between groups. In addition, there were no differences in clinical characteristics and there were no knee revisions or recognized deep infections during follow-up. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates that the MC-bearing design changes tibiofemoral kinematics and increases the area of congruency towards more native knee kinematics than the CR bearing. In perspective this may contribute to a more stabilized knee motion, restoring the patient's confidence in knee function during daily activities.