Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Systematic Review on Neurological Outcomes for Cervical Degenerative Myelopathy After Anterior Decompression Surgery: Motion Preservation vs Fusion.
Schuermans, Valérie N E; Smeets, Anouk Y J M; van de Kar, Lauren G C; Hermans, Sem M M; Curfs, Inez; Boselie, Toon F M; van Santbrink, Henk.
Afiliación
  • Schuermans VNE; Department Of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands Valerie.schuermans@mumc.nl.
  • Smeets AYJM; Department Of Neurosurgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, Netherlands.
  • van de Kar LGC; CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
  • Hermans SMM; Department Of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands.
  • Curfs I; Department Of Neurosurgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, Netherlands.
  • Boselie TFM; Department Of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands.
  • van Santbrink H; Department Of Neurosurgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, Netherlands.
Int J Spine Surg ; 16(6): 969-976, 2022 Dec.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35831065
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Although it is well established that surgically treated patients with cervical degenerative myelopathy (CDM) improve irrespective of the anterior decompression technique used, no consensus exists on what technique is superior in terms of neurological recovery. A general concern exists that anterior cervical discectomy with arthroplasty (ACDA) leads to less favorable outcomes in CDM due to microtrauma caused by preserved mobility. It is remarkable that current literature mainly uses pain scores to assess clinical outcomes after anterior decompression surgery, especially considering that pain may not be the most relevant outcome for CDM. This systematic review evaluated the literature concerning neurological outcomes in patients with CDM treated with anterior decompression surgery and assessed by validated myelopathy scores.

METHODS:

Systematic searches were carried out in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library. Prospective studies were included when patients with isolated CDM were treated with anterior decompression surgery, and a validated myelopathy outcome score was used.

RESULTS:

A total of 11 studies were included from the 16,032 identified studies. All studies used the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) outcome score and showed improvement for all anterior techniques. The mean improvement in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) was 4.80 and 3.64 for the modified JOA and JOA outcome scores, respectively. The JOA for ACDA showed a mean improvement of 5.51. The overall quality of the included articles was low to moderate according to the Cochrane tool.

CONCLUSION:

Neurological recovery of CDM is similar after all anterior decompression techniques, including ACDA when compared with ACDF. CLINICAL RELEVANCE The current literature gives no reason to dissuade the use of ACDA in cervical myelopathy.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Int J Spine Surg Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Int J Spine Surg Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos