Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of Tricuspid Regurgitation Severity Between Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Versus Right Ventricular Pacing in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
Livesay, James; Fogelson, Benjamin; Tahir, Hassan; Baljepally, Raj.
Afiliación
  • Livesay J; Department of Medicine, University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine, Knoxville, TN, USA.
  • Fogelson B; Department of Medicine, University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine, Knoxville, TN, USA.
  • Tahir H; Department of Medicine, University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine, Knoxville, TN, USA.
  • Baljepally R; Department of Medicine, University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine, Knoxville, TN, USA.
Cardiol Res ; 13(3): 128-134, 2022 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35836733
ABSTRACT

Background:

Right ventricular (RV) lead placement can worsen tricuspid regurgitation (TR). TR is known to be associated with lower survival irrespective of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) or pulmonary hypertension (PH). Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) often have PH and pre-existent TR with higher morbidity and mortality from worsening TR. Prior studies are lacking to indicate if cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may be more beneficial in lessening TR in COPD patients. Therefore, we sought to study if patients with COPD will have less TR with CRT versus non-CRT devices.

Methods:

We performed a retrospective, single-center analysis on 154 COPD patients (mean age = 71.69 ± 10.58, males = 54.14%) that required single-chamber (n = 27), dual-chamber (n = 90), or CRT (n = 37) devices. TR severity, LVEF and right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) were evaluated by two cardiologists in a blinded fashion. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Chi-square tests were applied for continuous and categorical variables respectively. The primary endpoint was a change in the severity of TR comparing pre-device versus post-device echocardiogram. Secondary endpoints included changes in LVEF and RVSP.

Results:

COPD patients, who underwent a CRT device had a significantly lower incidence of worsening TR (16%) when compared to single- (37%) (P = 0.001) and dual-chamber devices (30%) (P = 0.02). The increase in RVSP was similar between the groups. There was an expected improvement in LVEF in the CRT group.

Conclusions:

COPD patients receiving a CRT device were least likely to have worsening TR, compared to single- or dual-chamber devices. Since both COPD and progression in TR may result in poor outcomes, our study may suggest that an upfront strategy of CRT rather than a single- or dual-chamber device may be more beneficial in COPD patients, especially with pre-existent TR.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cardiol Res Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: CA / CANADA / CANADÁ

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cardiol Res Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: CA / CANADA / CANADÁ