[Rapid health technology assessment of four oral Chinese patent medicines for constipation].

ABSTRACT

This study evaluated the safety, efficacy, and cost effectiveness of Biantong Capsules(Tablets), Maren Runchang Pills, Qirong Runchang Oral Liquid, and Qihuang Tongmi Soft Capsules in the treatment of constipation by the rapid health technology assessment(RHTA) to provide evidence for clinical decision and references for rapid evaluation of Chinese patent medicine(CPM). CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, SinoMed, PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched for research articles from database inception to February 2022. Two reviewers conducted literature screening, data extraction, and quality evaluation according to the predetermined standards. Descriptive analysis of the results combined with visual charts was performed. Sixty research articles were included, involving 44 randomized controlled trials(RCTs), 7 clinical controlled trials(CCTs), 4 systematic reviews/Meta-analyses, and 5 economic analysis studies. As revealed by the results, Biantong Capsules(Tablets) could be used for postoperative and senile constipation, in which some studies reported Biantong Capsules(Tablets) were superior to Maren Runchang Pills and Qirong Runchang Oral Liquid. Maren Runchang Pills were mainly used for senile constipation, and the efficacy was similar to that of conventional wes-tern medicine, but the cost was low and the compliance of patients was good. Qirong Runchang Oral Liquid was indicated for disease-derived or drug-induced constipation, chronic constipation, and senile constipation with fewer adverse reactions. Qihuang Tongmi Soft Capsules had good efficacy and safety in the treatment of functional constipation. Overall, compared with western medicine glycerine enema and lactulose, the number of clinical studies of the four CMPs was small, but they targeted constipation patients with different subtypes. In conclusion, the four CMPs have their advantages and characteristics in the treatment of constipation, but they are restric-ted by sparse existing evidence, low quality of evidence, and insufficient economic research. In the future, more high-quality and long-term follow-up studies should be carried out to obtain reliable evidence. Meanwhile, it is called for strengthening the economic evaluation of CMPs to provide evidence for decision-making.