Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Addressing Moral Distress: lessons Learnt from a Non-Interventional Longitudinal Study on Moral Distress.
Prentice, Trisha M; Imbulana, Dilini I; Gillam, Lynn; Davis, Peter G; Janvier, Annie.
Afiliación
  • Prentice TM; Neonatal Medicine, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Imbulana DI; Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Gillam L; Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Davis PG; Newborn Research, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Janvier A; Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
AJOB Empir Bioeth ; 13(4): 226-236, 2022.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35856901
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Moral distress is prevalent within the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and can negatively affect clinicians. Studies have evaluated the causes of moral distress and interventions to mitigate its harmful effects. However, the effects of participating in moral distress studies have not been evaluated.

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the impact of participation in a longitudinal, non-intervention research project on moral distress in the NICU.

DESIGN:

Clinicians who previously participated in an 18-month longitudinal research study on moral distress at two NICUs were invited to complete a questionnaire on the impact of participation. The original study required regular completion of surveys that sought predictions of death, disability and the intensity/nature of moral distress experienced by clinicians caring for extremely preterm babies. Individual and unit-wide effects were explored. Free-text responses to open-ended questions were analyzed using inductive content analysis.

RESULTS:

A total of 249/463 (53%) eligible clinicians participated. Participation in the original 18-month study was perceived as having a positive impact by 58% of respondents. Clinicians found articulating their views therapeutic (76%) and useful in clarifying personal opinions about the babies (85%). Free-text responses revealed the research stimulated increased reflection, validated feelings and increased dialogue amongst clinicians. Respondents generally did not find participation distressing (70%). However, a small number of physicians felt the focus of discussion shifted from the baby to the clinicians. Intensity and prevalence of moral distress did not significantly change over the 18-month period.

CONCLUSIONS:

Participating in moral distress research prompted regular reflection regarding attitudes toward fragile patients, improving ethical awareness. This is useful in clarifying personal views that may influence patient care. Participation also enhanced communication around difficult clinical scenarios and improved provider satisfaction. These factors are insufficient to significantly reduce moral distress in isolation.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Médicos / Estrés Psicológico Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Ethics Límite: Humans / Newborn Idioma: En Revista: AJOB Empir Bioeth Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Médicos / Estrés Psicológico Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Ethics Límite: Humans / Newborn Idioma: En Revista: AJOB Empir Bioeth Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia