Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A real-world study comparing pre-post billed annualized bleed rates and total cost of care among non-inhibitor patients with hemophilia A switching from FVIII prophylaxis to emicizumab.
Batt, Katharine; Schultz, Bob G; Caicedo, Jorge; Hollenbeak, Christopher S; Agrawal, Neha; Chatterjee, Sagnik; Bullano, Michael.
Afiliación
  • Batt K; Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Wake Forest Baptist School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
  • Schultz BG; Outcomes Research, Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc., Lexington, MA, USA.
  • Caicedo J; Outcomes Research, Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc., Lexington, MA, USA.
  • Hollenbeak CS; Department of Health Policy and Administration, The Pennsylvania State University, College of Health and Human Development, University Park, PA, USA.
  • Agrawal N; Complete HEOR Solutions, North Wales, PA, USA.
  • Chatterjee S; Complete HEOR Solutions, North Wales, PA, USA.
  • Bullano M; Outcomes Research, Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc., Lexington, MA, USA.
Curr Med Res Opin ; 38(10): 1685-1693, 2022 10.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35880468
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Factor VIII (FVIII) replacement and emicizumab have demonstrated efficacy for prevention of bleeds among patients with hemophilia A (PwHA) compared to on-demand (OD) use. Evidence investigating clinical outcomes and healthcare costs of non-inhibitor PwHA switching from prophylaxis with FVIII concentrates to emicizumab has not been well-established within large real-world datasets. This study aimed to investigate billed annualized bleed rates (ABRb) and total cost of care (TCC) among non-inhibitor PwHA switching from FVIII-prophylaxis to emicizumab-prophylaxis.

METHODS:

This retrospective, observational study was conducted using IQVIA PharMetrics Plus, a US administrative claims database. The date of first claim for emicizumab was defined as the index date. OD patients and inhibitor patients were excluded. Bleeds were identified using a list of 535 diagnosis codes. Bayesian models were developed to estimate the probability ABRb worsens and TCC increases after switching to emicizumab. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to test statistical significance of changes in ABRb and TCC after switch.

RESULTS:

Among the 121 identified patients, the difference in mean ABRb between FVIII-prophylaxis (0.68 [SD = 1.28]) and emicizumab (0.55 [SD = 1.48]) was insignificant (p = .142). The mean annual TCC significantly increased for patients switching from FVIII-prophylaxis ($518,151 [SD = $289,934]) to emicizumab ($652,679 [SD = $340,126]; p < .0001). The Bayesian models estimated a 21.0% probability of the ABRb worsening and a 99.9% probability of increasing TCC after switch.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study found that in male non-inhibitor PwHA, switching from FVIII prophylaxis to emicizumab incurs substantial cost increase with no significant benefit in ABRb. This evidence may help guide providers, payers, and patients in shared decision-making conversations around best treatment options.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Hemostáticos / Hemofilia A Tipo de estudio: Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Curr Med Res Opin Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Hemostáticos / Hemofilia A Tipo de estudio: Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Curr Med Res Opin Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos
...