Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Elevated exposures to respirable crystalline silica among engineered stone fabrication workers in California, January 2019-February 2020.
Surasi, Krishna; Ballen, Brittany; Weinberg, Justine L; Materna, Barbara L; Harrison, Robert; Cummings, Kristin J; Heinzerling, Amy.
Afiliación
  • Surasi K; Occupational Health Branch, California Department of Public Health, Richmond, California, USA.
  • Ballen B; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Epidemic Intelligence Service, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Weinberg JL; Occupational Health Branch, California Department of Public Health, Richmond, California, USA.
  • Materna BL; University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Harrison R; Occupational Health Branch, California Department of Public Health, Richmond, California, USA.
  • Cummings KJ; Public Health Institute, Richmond, Richmond, USA.
  • Heinzerling A; Occupational Health Branch, California Department of Public Health, Richmond, California, USA.
Am J Ind Med ; 65(9): 701-707, 2022 09.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35899403
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Workers fabricating engineered stone face high risk for exposure to respirable crystalline silica (RCS) and subsequent development of silicosis. In response, the California Division of Occupational Safety and Health (Cal/OSHA) performed targeted enforcement inspections at engineered stone fabrication worksites. We investigated RCS exposures and employer adherence to Cal/OSHA's RCS and respiratory protection standards from these inspections to assess ongoing risk to stone fabrication workers.

METHODS:

We extracted employee personal air sampling results from Cal/OSHA inspection files and calculated RCS exposures. Standards require that employers continue monitoring employee RCS exposures and perform medical surveillance when exposures are at or above the action level (AL; 25 µg/m3 ); exposures above the permissible exposure limit (PEL; 50 µg/m3 ) are prohibited. We obtained RCS and respiratory protection standard violation citations from a federal database.

RESULTS:

We analyzed RCS exposures for 152 employees at 47 workplaces. Thirty-eight (25%) employees had exposures above the PEL (median = 89.7 µg/m3 ; range = 50.7-670.7 µg/m3 ); 17 (11%) had exposures between the AL and PEL. Twenty-four (51%) workplaces had ≥1 exposure above the PEL; 7 (15%) had ≥1 exposure between the AL and PEL. Thirty-four (72%) workplaces were cited for ≥1 RCS standard violation. Twenty-seven (57%) workplaces were cited for ≥1 respiratory protection standard violation.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our investigation demonstrates widespread RCS overexposure among workers and numerous employer Cal/OSHA standard violation citations. More enforcement and educational efforts could improve employer compliance with Cal/OSHA standards and inform employers and employees of the risks for RCS exposure and strategies for reducing exposure.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Silicosis / Exposición Profesional Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Am J Ind Med Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Silicosis / Exposición Profesional Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Am J Ind Med Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos
...