Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patient Experience and Feedback After Using an Electronic Health Record-Integrated COVID-19 Symptom Checker: Survey Study.
Liu, Andrew W; Odisho, Anobel Y; Brown Iii, William; Gonzales, Ralph; Neinstein, Aaron B; Judson, Timothy J.
Afiliación
  • Liu AW; Center for Digital Health Innovation, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
  • Odisho AY; Center for Digital Health Innovation, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
  • Brown Iii W; Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
  • Gonzales R; Center for Digital Health Innovation, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
  • Neinstein AB; Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
  • Judson TJ; Bakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
JMIR Hum Factors ; 9(3): e40064, 2022 Sep 13.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35960593
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Symptom checkers have been widely used during the COVID-19 pandemic to alleviate strain on health systems and offer patients a 24-7 self-service triage option. Although studies suggest that users may positively perceive web-based symptom checkers, no studies have quantified user feedback after use of an electronic health record-integrated COVID-19 symptom checker with self-scheduling functionality.

OBJECTIVE:

In this paper, we aimed to understand user experience, user satisfaction, and user-reported alternatives to the use of a COVID-19 symptom checker with self-triage and self-scheduling functionality.

METHODS:

We launched a patient-portal-based self-triage and self-scheduling tool in March 2020 for patients with COVID-19 symptoms, exposures, or questions. We made an optional, anonymous Qualtrics survey available to patients immediately after they completed the symptom checker.

RESULTS:

Between December 16, 2021, and March 28, 2022, there were 395 unique responses to the survey. Overall, the respondents reported high satisfaction across all demographics, with a median rating of 8 out of 10 and 288/395 (47.6%) of the respondents giving a rating of 9 or 10 out of 10. User satisfaction scores were not associated with any demographic factors. The most common user-reported alternatives had the web-based tool not been available were calling the COVID-19 telephone hotline and sending a patient-portal message to their physician for advice. The ability to schedule a test online was the most important symptom checker feature for the respondents. The most common categories of user feedback were regarding other COVID-19 services (eg, telephone hotline), policies, or procedures, and requesting additional features or functionality.

CONCLUSIONS:

This analysis suggests that COVID-19 symptom checkers with self-triage and self-scheduling functionality may have high overall user satisfaction, regardless of user demographics. By allowing users to self-triage and self-schedule tests and visits, tools such as this may prevent unnecessary calls and messages to clinicians. Individual feedback suggested that the user experience for this type of tool is highly dependent on the organization's operational workflows for COVID-19 testing and care. This study provides insight for the implementation and improvement of COVID-19 symptom checkers to ensure high user satisfaction.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: JMIR Hum Factors Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: JMIR Hum Factors Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos