Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Research ethics systems, processes, and awareness across Europe: Radiography research ethics standards for Europe (RRESFE).
Bockhold, S; McNulty, J; Abdurakman, E; Bezzina, P; Drey, N; England, A; Flinton, D; Khine, R; McEntee, M; Mekis, N; Precht, H; Rainford, L; Sá Dos Reis, C; Santos, A; Syrgiamiotis, V; Willis, S; Woodley, J; Beardmore, C; Harris, R; O'Regan, T; Malamateniou, C.
Afiliación
  • Bockhold S; Radiography and Diagnostic Imaging, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Ireland. Electronic address: sophie.bockhold@ucd.ie.
  • McNulty J; Radiography and Diagnostic Imaging, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Ireland. Electronic address: jonathan.mcnulty@ucd.ie.
  • Abdurakman E; Division of Midwifery and Radiography, School of Health Sciences, City University of London, United Kingdom.
  • Bezzina P; Radiography, Faculty of Health Sciences, L-Università ta' Malta, Malta.
  • Drey N; Division of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, City University of London, United Kingdom.
  • England A; Discipline of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy, School of Medicine, University College Cork, Ireland.
  • Flinton D; Division of Midwifery and Radiography, School of Health Sciences, City University of London, United Kingdom.
  • Khine R; School of Health Care and Social Work, Buckinghamshire New University, United Kingdom.
  • McEntee M; Discipline of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy, School of Medicine, University College Cork, Ireland.
  • Mekis N; Medical Imaging and Radiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia.
  • Precht H; Diagnostic and Treatment and Radiography Education, Health Sciences Research Centre, UCL University College, Denmark.
  • Rainford L; Radiography and Diagnostic Imaging, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Ireland.
  • Sá Dos Reis C; Radiological Medical Imaging Technology, School of Health Sciences, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Santos A; Medical Imaging and Radiotherapy, ESTESC-Coimbra Health School, Instituto Politécnico de Coimbra, Portugal.
  • Syrgiamiotis V; CT-MRI Department, General Children's Hospital of Athens Agia Sophia, and University of West Attica, Greece.
  • Willis S; Health Education England, National Health Service, London, United Kingdom.
  • Woodley J; School of Health and Social Wellbeing, Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, United Kingdom.
  • Beardmore C; Society and College of Radiographers, London, United Kingdom.
  • Harris R; Society and College of Radiographers, London, United Kingdom.
  • O'Regan T; Society and College of Radiographers, London, United Kingdom.
  • Malamateniou C; Division of Midwifery and Radiography, School of Health Sciences, City University of London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: christina.Malamateniou@city.ac.uk.
Radiography (Lond) ; 28(4): 1032-1041, 2022 11.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35964488
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The Radiography Research Ethics Standards for Europe (RRESFE) project aims to provide a cross-sectional snapshot of current research ethics systems, processes, and awareness of such, across Europe together with identifying the associated challenges, education, and training needs.

METHODS:

A cross-sectional online survey targeting radiography researchers in Europe was conducted. Data collection took place between April 26 and July 12, 2021, using a snowball sampling approach. Descriptive and analytical statistics were used to identify trends in research ethics frameworks across Europe.

RESULTS:

285 responses were received across 33 European and 23 non-European countries. Most (n = 221; 95%) European respondents stated ethics approval is required before commencing research in their country. Requirements around research ethics approval and awareness of such requirements varied by European region (X2 (2, n = 129) = 7.234, p = 0.013) and were found to differ depending on the type of research participant and study design. Additionally, European respondents reported ethics approval is a national requirement more often than their non-European counterparts (X2 (1, n = 282) = 4.316, p = 0.049). Requirements for ethics approval were also associated with the undergraduate programme duration (2-year vs. 3-year vs. 3.5 year vs. 4-year vs. multiple programme durations; X2 (4, n = 231) = 10.075, p = 0.016) and availability of postgraduate training (postgraduate training available vs. postgraduate training not available; X2 (1, n = 231) = 15.448, p = <0.001) within respondents' country.

CONCLUSION:

Respondents from countries with longer programme durations/availability of multiple programme lengths, availability of postgraduate training, and establishment of European Qualifications Framework Level 6 were generally associated with less uncertainty and more comprehensive research ethics requirements. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Results are informative of the current status of research ethics within evidence-based radiography.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ética en Investigación Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Ethics Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Radiography (Lond) Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ética en Investigación Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Ethics Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Radiography (Lond) Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article