Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Masking auditory feedback does not eliminate repetition reduction.
Jacobs, Cassandra L; Loucks, Torrey M; Watson, Duane G; Dell, Gary S.
Afiliación
  • Jacobs CL; University of Wisconsin, Madison.
  • Loucks TM; University of Alberta.
  • Watson DG; Vanderbilt University.
  • Dell GS; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Lang Cogn Neurosci ; 35(4): 485-497, 2020.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35992578
Repetition reduces word duration. Explanations of this process have appealed to audience design, internal production mechanisms, and combinations thereof (e.g. Kahn & Arnold, 2015). Jacobs, Yiu, Watson, and Dell (2015) proposed the auditory feedback hypothesis, which states that speakers must hear a word, produced either by themselves or another speaker, in order for duration reduction on a subsequent production. We conducted a strong test of the auditory feedback hypothesis in two experiments, in which we used masked auditory feedback and whispering to prevent speakers from hearing themselves fully. Both experiments showed that despite limiting the sources of normal auditory feedback, repetition reduction was observed to equal extents in masked and unmasked conditions, suggesting that repetition reduction may be supported by multiple sources, such as somatosensory feedback and feedforward signals, depending on their availability.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Lang Cogn Neurosci Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Lang Cogn Neurosci Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Reino Unido