Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Rhythmic cueing, dance, resistance training, and Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Karpodini, Claire Chrysanthi; Dinas, Petros C; Angelopoulou, Efthalia; Wyon, Matthew A; Haas, Aline Nogueira; Bougiesi, Maria; Papageorgiou, Sokratis G; Koutedakis, Yiannis.
Afiliación
  • Karpodini CC; Sport and Physical Activity Research Centre, Faculty of Education, Health and Wellbeing, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom.
  • Dinas PC; Functional Architecture of Mammals in their Environment Laboratory, Department of Physical Education and Sport Science, University of Thessaly, Volos, Greece.
  • Angelopoulou E; First Department of Neurology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Eginition University Hospital, Athens, Greece.
  • Wyon MA; Sport and Physical Activity Research Centre, Faculty of Education, Health and Wellbeing, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom.
  • Haas AN; School of Physical Education Physiotherapy and Dance, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Brazil.
  • Bougiesi M; Functional Architecture of Mammals in their Environment Laboratory, Department of Physical Education and Sport Science, University of Thessaly, Volos, Greece.
  • Papageorgiou SG; First Department of Neurology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Eginition University Hospital, Athens, Greece.
  • Koutedakis Y; Sport and Physical Activity Research Centre, Faculty of Education, Health and Wellbeing, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom.
Front Neurol ; 13: 875178, 2022.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36034281
ABSTRACT

Objectives:

The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to synthesize evidence associated with the functional and clinical effectiveness of rhythmic cueing, dance, or resistance training (RT) on motor and non-motor parameters in Parkinson's Disease patients, and to provide a comparative perspective not offered by existing systematic reviews.

Methodology:

Eligibility criteria for selecting studies retained no restrictions in methodological design and included interventions of rhythmic cueing, dance, RT, and measurements of motor and non-motor parameters. Animal studies, reviews, editorials, conferences, magazines, and gray literature articles were excluded. Two independent investigators searched Cochrane Library, Medline, PubMed, and SPORTDiscus from the date of their inception until 1 June 2021. The ROBINS-I tool was employed for the non-randomized controlled trials, and the updated for Risk of Bias 2 tool of Cochrane Library used for randomized controlled trials. For meta-analyses, the RevMan 5.4.13 software was used. For incompatible meta-analysis studies, a narrative data synthesis was conducted.

Results:

A total of 49 studies included in the systematic review involving 3767 PD participants. Meta-analyses revealed that rhythmic cueing training assists gait velocity (p = 0.01), stride length (p = 0.01), and motor symptoms (p = 0.03). Similarly, dance training benefits stride length (p = 0.05), lower extremity function-TUG (p = 0.01), and motor symptoms (p = 0.01), whilst RT improves lower extremity function-TUG (p = 0.01), quality of life (p = 0.01), knee flexion (p = 0.02), and leg press (p = 0.01). Subgroup analyses have shown non-significant differences in gait velocity (p = 0.26), stride length (p = 0.80), functional mobility-TUG (p = 0.74), motor symptoms-UPDRS-III (p = 0.46), and quality of life-PDQ39 (p = 0.44).

Conclusion:

Rhythmic cueing, dance, or RT positively affect the examined outcomes, with rhythmic cueing to be associated with three outcomes (Gait, Stride, and UPDRS-III), dance with three outcomes (TUG, Stride, and UPDRS-III), and RT with two outcomes (TUG and PDQ-39). Subgroup analyses confirmed the beneficial effects of these forms of exercise. Clinicians should entertain the idea of more holistic exercise protocols aiming at improving PD manifestations.International Prospective Register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) (registration number CRD42020212380).
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Systematic_reviews Aspecto: Patient_preference Idioma: En Revista: Front Neurol Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Systematic_reviews Aspecto: Patient_preference Idioma: En Revista: Front Neurol Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido