Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Accidental removal of dialysis central venous catheter inserted for blood purification therapy: a single-center study.
Kojima, Shigeki; Marui, Yuhji; Shibagaki, Yugo; Sakurada, Tsutomu.
Afiliación
  • Kojima S; Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, 2-16-1 Sugao, Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan. s2kojima@marianna-u.ac.jp.
  • Marui Y; Department of Urology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, 2-16-1 Sugao, Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan.
  • Shibagaki Y; Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, 2-16-1 Sugao, Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan.
  • Sakurada T; Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, 2-16-1 Sugao, Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan.
Clin Exp Nephrol ; 26(12): 1218-1222, 2022 Dec.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36056979
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Dialysis central venous catheters (DCs) are used for various blood purification therapies. Accidental removal of a DC is a potentially life-threatening event. However, the risk factors associated with accidental removal have rarely been discussed in the literature.

METHODS:

We performed a 5 year retrospective, single-center, cohort study of patients who were admitted to the ward other than intensive care units and were inserted DCs. We compared patient characteristics between patients who used DCs with and without a history of accidental removal.

RESULTS:

There were 17 cases of accidental removal (3.5%) out of 489 DC insertions during the observation period. There was no significant difference between patients with and without accidental removal in terms of age, sex, reason for DC insertion, catheter type, or insertion site. The presence of dementia was 35 and 11% (p = 0.006), and that of delirium was 88 and 13% (p < 0.0001) in those with and without accidental removal, respectively. The median days from insertion to accidental removal were 5 (range 0-21) days, and removal occurred mainly at night (71%). One patient with accidental removal developed hemorrhagic shock, but there no deaths occurred due to accidental removal.

CONCLUSIONS:

The present findings suggest that to prevent accidental removal, sufficient attention should be paid to delirium that occurs after admission as well to pre-existing dementia at the time of admission. As accidental removal occurs most commonly early after insertion and at night, special attention should be paid during these periods.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cateterismo Venoso Central / Delirio / Demencia / Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres / Catéteres Venosos Centrales Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Exp Nephrol Asunto de la revista: NEFROLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cateterismo Venoso Central / Delirio / Demencia / Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres / Catéteres Venosos Centrales Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Exp Nephrol Asunto de la revista: NEFROLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón