Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Minimally Invasive Transforaminal versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients Undergoing Revision Fusion: Clinical Outcome Comparison.
Nie, James W; Hartman, Timothy J; Jacob, Kevin C; Patel, Madhav R; Vanjani, Nisheka N; MacGregor, Keith R; Oyetayo, Omolabake O; Zheng, Eileen; Singh, Kern.
Afiliación
  • Nie JW; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Hartman TJ; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Jacob KC; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Patel MR; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Vanjani NN; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • MacGregor KR; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Oyetayo OO; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Zheng E; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Singh K; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA. Electronic address: kern.singh@rushortho.com.
World Neurosurg ; 167: e1208-e1218, 2022 Nov.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36075354
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

We aim to compare perioperative/postoperative clinical outcomes between minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) and anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) in patients presenting for revision surgery.

METHODS:

A retrospective database was reviewed for procedures between November 2005 and December 2021. Revision MIS-TLIF/ALIFs were included, whereas primary fusions or diagnosis of infection/malignancy/trauma were excluded. Patients were grouped into MIS-TLIF/ALIF cohorts. Preoperatively/postoperatively collected patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) included visual analog scale back/leg score, Oswestry Disability Index, Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System-Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), and Short-Form 12-Item Survey Mental/Physical Composite Scores.

RESULTS:

A total of 164 patients were eligible, with 84 patients in the MIS-TLIF cohort. The presence of degenerative spondylolisthesis and central stenosis, narcotic consumption on postoperative day 0/1, and postoperative urinary retention rates was greater in the MIS-TLIF cohort (P ≤ 0.036, all). Preoperative PROMs between cohorts did not significantly differ. Significantly favorable postoperative PROM scores were shown in the MIS-TLIF cohort with PROMIS-PF at 12 weeks/6 months (P ≤ 0.033, all). Most patients in both cohorts achieved overall minimum clinically important difference for visual analog scale back/leg score, Oswestry Disability Index, Short-Form 12-Item Survey Physical Composite Score, and PROMIS-PF. No differences were noted between cohorts within rates of MCID achievement.

CONCLUSIONS:

Patients undergoing revision fusion via MIS-TLIF or ALIF reported similar 1-year postoperative mean outcomes and rates of meaningful clinical achievement for physical function, mental health, disability, and back/leg pain. However, patients undergoing revision MIS-TLIF reported improved physical function at 12 weeks and 6 months. Perioperatively, patients undergoing revision MIS-TLIF were noted to consume significantly greater quantities of narcotics.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fusión Vertebral / Espondilolistesis Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: World Neurosurg Asunto de la revista: NEUROCIRURGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fusión Vertebral / Espondilolistesis Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: World Neurosurg Asunto de la revista: NEUROCIRURGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos