Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of the efficacy of a 2-step etch-and-rinse, 2-step self-etch and 1-step self-etch adhesive systems, in class II primary molars restorations. An one year prospective, randomized clinical trial.
Soares, A D; Ramos, J C; Alves, L C; Pereira, J L; Caramelo, F; Costa, A L.
Afiliación
  • Soares AD; Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Paediatric and Preventive Dentistry, University of Coimbra (FMUC), Coimbra, Portugal. ana.dani.soares@gmail.com.
  • Ramos JC; Área de Medicina Dentária, Av. Bissaya Barreto, Blocos de Celas, 3000-075, Coimbra, Portugal. ana.dani.soares@gmail.com.
  • Alves LC; Área de Medicina Dentária, Av. Bissaya Barreto, Blocos de Celas, 3000-075, Coimbra, Portugal.
  • Pereira JL; Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Operative Dentistry, University of Coimbra (FMUC), Coimbra, Portugal.
  • Caramelo F; Faculty of Medicine, Center for Innovation and Research in Oral Sciences (CIROS), University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
  • Costa AL; Área de Medicina Dentária, Av. Bissaya Barreto, Blocos de Celas, 3000-075, Coimbra, Portugal.
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent ; 23(5): 845-854, 2022 Oct.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36098905
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To evaluate the clinical efficacy at 6 months (6 M) and 12 months (12 M) of 3 adhesive strategies (two-step etch-and-rinse; two-step self-etch; one step self-etch) used in composite resin restorations in primary molars.

METHODS:

This randomized clinical study involved 101 class II restorations in primary molars of 34 children (4-8 years old), distributed by 3 groups according to the 3 tested adhesive systems GI- ClearfilTMS3Bond Plus (CSB); GII- ClearfilTMSE Protect Bond (CSEPB); GIII- Prime&Bond®XP (PBXP). Restorations were evaluated according to FDI criteria, immediately after execution, at 6 M and 12 M. All ethical and legal requirements were met. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM®SPSS®v26 and MS Excel® (5% significance level).

RESULTS:

The aesthetic, biological and most of the functional parameters evaluated remained without significant changes over time. Statistically significant differences were only found regarding the "marginal adaptation" parameter at 12 M, with worsening of scores for the three groups (p < 0.001). Comparing the groups, no significant differences were detected between any of the evaluated parameters (aesthetics properties p = 0.721; functional properties p = 0.122).

CONCLUSIONS:

After a one-year period, the self-etch adhesives tested presented a clinical efficacy similar to the etch-and-rinse adhesive in restoring class II cavities in primary molars. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN11458186.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Recubrimiento Dental Adhesivo / Recubrimientos Dentinarios Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Aspecto: Ethics Límite: Child / Child, preschool / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur Arch Paediatr Dent Asunto de la revista: ODONTOLOGIA / PEDIATRIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Portugal

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Recubrimiento Dental Adhesivo / Recubrimientos Dentinarios Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Aspecto: Ethics Límite: Child / Child, preschool / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur Arch Paediatr Dent Asunto de la revista: ODONTOLOGIA / PEDIATRIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Portugal