Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with systemic lupus erythematosus: can we improve predictions with machine learning?
Fazzari, Melissa J; Guerra, Marta M; Salmon, Jane; Kim, Mimi Y.
Afiliación
  • Fazzari MJ; Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA melissa.fazzari@einsteinmed.org.
  • Guerra MM; Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
  • Salmon J; Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
  • Kim MY; Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.
Lupus Sci Med ; 9(1)2022 09.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36104120
OBJECTIVES: Nearly 20% of pregnancies in patients with SLE result in an adverse pregnancy outcome (APO). We previously developed an APO prediction model using logistic regression and data from Predictors of pRegnancy Outcome: bioMarkers In Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (PROMISSE), a large multicentre study of pregnant women with mild/moderate SLE and/or antiphospholipid antibodies. Our goal was to determine whether machine learning (ML) approaches improve APO prediction and identify other risk factors. METHODS: The PROMISSE data included 41 predictors from 385 subjects; 18.4% had APO (preterm delivery due to placental insufficiency/pre-eclampsia, fetal/neonatal death, fetal growth restriction). Logistic regression with stepwise selection (LR-S), least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), random forest (RF), neural network (NN), support vector machines (SVM-RBF), gradient boosting (GB) and SuperLearner (SL) were compared by cross-validated area under the ROC curve (AUC) and calibration. RESULTS: Previously identified APO risk factors, antihypertensive medication use, low platelets, SLE disease activity and lupus anticoagulant (LAC), were confirmed as important with each algorithm. LASSO additionally revealed potential interactions between LAC and anticardiolipin IgG, among others. SL performed the best (AUC=0.78), but was statistically indistinguishable from LASSO, SVM-RBF and RF (AUC=0.77 for all). LR-S, NN and GB had worse AUC (0.71-0.74) and calibration scores. CONCLUSIONS: We predicted APO with reasonable accuracy using variables routinely assessed prior to the 12th week of pregnancy. LASSO and some ML methods performed better than a standard logistic regression approach. Substantial improvement in APO prediction will likely be realised, not with increasingly complex algorithms but by the discovery of new biomarkers and APO risk factors.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Complicaciones del Embarazo / Síndrome Antifosfolípido / Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Newborn / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Lupus Sci Med Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Complicaciones del Embarazo / Síndrome Antifosfolípido / Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Newborn / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Lupus Sci Med Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido