Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Image Distortion During Flexible Ureteroscopy: A Laboratory Model Comparing Super Pulsed Thulium Fiber Laser vs High-Power Ho:YAG Laser.
Miller, Caleb S; Whiles, Bristol B; Ito, Willian E; Machen, Edward; Thompson, Jeffrey A; Duchene, David A; Neff, Donald A; Molina, Wilson R.
Afiliación
  • Miller CS; Department of Urology, The University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
  • Whiles BB; Department of Urology, The University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
  • Ito WE; Department of Urology, The University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
  • Machen E; University of Kansas, School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
  • Thompson JA; Department of Biostatistics, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
  • Duchene DA; Department of Urology, The University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
  • Neff DA; Department of Urology, The University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
  • Molina WR; Department of Urology, The University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
J Endourol ; 37(1): 99-104, 2023 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36106599
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

Digital ureteroscopes employ "chip-on-the-tip" technology that allows for significant improvement in image resolution. However, image distortion often occurs during laser lithotripsy owing to acoustic wave production. We sought to compare image distortion using different laser power settings and distances from the laser fiber tip to the scope for the Super Pulsed Thulium Fiber (SPTF) laser and high-power HolmiumYAG (HoYAG) laser. Materials and

Methods:

Ureteroscopy was simulated using a silicon kidney-ureter-bladder model fitted with a 12F/14F access sheath and the Lithovue™ (Boston Scientific), disposable digital flexible ureteroscope. At defined laser parameters (10, 20, 30 and 40 W, short pulse), a 200-µm laser fiber was slowly retracted toward the tip of the ureteroscope during laser activation. Image distortion was identified, and distance from the laser tip to the scope tip was determined. Data from the two lasers were compared utilizing t-tests.

Results:

After controlling for frequency, power, and laser mode, utilizing 1.0 J of energy was significantly associated with less feedback than 0.5 J (-0.091 mm, p ≤ 0.05). Increased power was associated with larger feedback distance (0.016 mm, p ≤ 0.05); however, increase in frequency did not have a significant effect (-0.001 mm, p = 0.39). The SPFT laser had significantly less feedback when compared with all Holmium laser modes.

Conclusions:

Increased total power results in image distortion occurring at greater distances from the tip of the ureteroscope during laser activation. Image distortion occurs further from the ureteroscope with HoYAG laser than with SPTF fibers at the same laser settings. In clinical practice, the tip of the laser fiber should be kept further away from the tip of the scope during ureteroscopy as the power increases as well as when utilizing the HoYAG system compared with the SPTF laser platform. The SPTF laser may have a better safety profile in terms of potential scope damage.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Litotripsia por Láser / Láseres de Estado Sólido Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Endourol Asunto de la revista: UROLOGIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Litotripsia por Láser / Láseres de Estado Sólido Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Endourol Asunto de la revista: UROLOGIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos