Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Alveolar bone measurements in magnetic resonance imaging compared with cone beam computed tomography: a pilot, ex-vivo study.
Fuglsig, João Marcus de Carvalho E Silva; Hansen, Brian; Schropp, Lars; Nixdorf, Donald R; Wenzel, Ann; Spin-Neto, Rubens.
Afiliación
  • Fuglsig JMCES; Department of Dentistry and Oral Health, Section for Oral Radiology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
  • Hansen B; Center of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
  • Schropp L; Department of Dentistry and Oral Health, Section for Oral Radiology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
  • Nixdorf DR; Division of TMD & Orofacial Pain, School of Dentistry, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
  • Wenzel A; Department of Radiology, Medical School, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
  • Spin-Neto R; Department of Dentistry and Oral Health, Section for Oral Radiology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Acta Odontol Scand ; 81(3): 241-248, 2023 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36112428
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To compare alveolar bone height and width measurements from zero-echo-time MRI (ZTE-MRI) and cone beam CT (CBCT), in human specimens. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

Twenty posterior edentulous sites in human cadaver specimens were imaged with CBCT and ZTE-MRI. Bone height and width at 1, 3, 5, 7 and 9 mm from the top of the alveolar ridge was measured by two trained observers in cross-sections of a site where an implant was to be planned. Twenty percent of the sample was measured in duplicate to assess method error and intra-observer reproducibility (ICC). The differences between CBCT and ZTE-MRI measurements were compared (t-test).

RESULTS:

Inter- and intra-observer reproducibility was >0.90. The method error (average between observers) for bone height was 0.45 mm and 0.39 mm, and for bone width (average) was 0.52 mm and 0.80 mm (CBCT and ZTE-MRI, respectively). The majority of the bone measurement differences were statistically insignificant, except bone width measurements at 5 mm (p ≤ .05 for both observers). Mean measurement differences were not larger than the method error.

CONCLUSION:

ZTE-MRI is not significantly different from CBCT when comparing measurements of alveolar bone height and width.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico / Proceso Alveolar Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Acta Odontol Scand Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Dinamarca

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico / Proceso Alveolar Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Acta Odontol Scand Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Dinamarca
...