A prospective clinical pilot study comparing two post-operative dressings in the treatment of surgical incisions in volunteers.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are one of the leading causes of post-operative morbidity and mortality worldwide. The original post-operative dressing, gauze taped in place, did not protect the incision from contamination. A recent clinical trial demonstrated that transparent films were superior to gauze in reducing SSIs. Transparent films are semi-occlusive (semi-permeable, transparent). They protect the incision from contamination; however, one of the drawbacks of current films is that they may become dislodged during daily activities, such as showering. Patients may not realise that the integrity of the dressing has been compromised, leading to soiling of the incision and possible infection. DrySee (DrySee Inc., US) is a novel film dressing with a colorimetric indicator that alerts the patient when the dressing has been compromised. METHOD: This trial compared the film dressing with the indicator (DSD) to a commonly used post-operative dressing comparator (Tegaderm + Pad; 3M, US). A 1.5cm incision was made in the volar forearm of volunteers. The incisions were randomly treated with the DSD or comparator dressing. RESULTS: A cohort of 20 volunteer patients was recruited. The DSD had a greater wear time and patients reported that the DSD dressing stayed in place better during activities compared to the comparator. CONCLUSION: Overall, 75% of patients preferred DSD and 25% preferred the comparator.