Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Chest Drainage Therapy: What Comes out of Pandora's Box Can Affect Patient Outcomes.
Antonicelli, Alberto; Monaco, Fabrizio; Carretta, Angelo; Burt, Bryan M; Sonett, Joshua R; Veronesi, Giulia.
Afiliación
  • Antonicelli A; Thoracic Surgery Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, 20132 Milan, Italy.
  • Monaco F; The National Coalition of Independent Scholars (NCIS), Brattleboro, VT 05301, USA.
  • Carretta A; Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, 20132 Milan, Italy.
  • Burt BM; Thoracic Surgery Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, 20132 Milan, Italy.
  • Sonett JR; Division of Thoracic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
  • Veronesi G; Section of General Thoracic Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA.
J Clin Med ; 11(18)2022 Sep 09.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36142958
ABSTRACT

Background:

Over the last 100 years, the original three-bottle chest drainage system has been variously engineered into compact disposables and electronic units. Clinicians are now surrounded by a plethora of different types of systems, but little is known about the way that they work and perform. Thus, we sought to test the performance of the most commonly used chest drainage units under conditions that are relevant to clinical practice.

Methods:

A pleural space environment simulator was built. Thirty-two units were tested under four clinical scenarios air leak interpretation during quiet breathing and after obstructed inspiration (−5 to −150 cmH2O), a buildup of negative pressure (−100 cmH2O), a bronchopleural fistula (10 L/min) and the need for effective external suction in the presence of air leakage. Twenty-five units were "traditional" thoracic drainages, five were "digital" low-flow/low-vacuum pumps and two were hybrids (a combination of the two). According to the design of the seal and of the suction control, the units were classified as wet-wet, wet-dry and dry-dry.

Results:

All wet units showed reverse air flow, with the potential to mimic an air leak when there was none. Ten wet units showed no automatic negative pressure relief features, while five dry-dry did but were slow to react. Ten wet and five dry-dry units showed no capability to handle a 10 L/min leak, as they were restrictive to flow (peak pressure up to 55 cmH2O). Only seven dry-suction units were able to maintain the set suction at high airflow rates (>20 L/min).

Conclusions:

Different chest drainage unit designs lead to different performances, some of which may negatively impact patient outcomes. This sounds the call to tailor our clinical practice for the individual patient. A paradigm shift to better understand all components of pleural physiology post-surgical intervention on this relatively neglected topic is needed to improve our daily practice.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Med Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Med Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia
...