Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Research in orthopaedic trauma surgery: approaches of basic scientists and clinicians and the relevance of interprofessional research teams.
Hildebrand, Frank; Höfer, Christine; Horst, Klemens; Friemert, Benedikt; Pennig, Dietmar; Marzi, Ingo; Stange, Richard.
Afiliación
  • Hildebrand F; Department of Orthopedics, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany. fhildebrand@ukaachen.de.
  • Höfer C; AUC-Academy for Trauma Surgery, Munich, Germany.
  • Horst K; Department of Orthopedics, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
  • Friemert B; Department of Orthopedics, Trauma, Septic and Reconstructive Surgery, Sports Traumatology, German Army Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
  • Pennig D; German Society for Trauma Surgery, Berlin, Germany.
  • Marzi I; Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Hospital of the Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
  • Stange R; Department of Regenerative Musculoskeletal Medicine, Institute for Musculoskeletal Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Munich, Germany.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg ; 49(1): 75-85, 2023 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36149435
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

An increasing clinical workload and growing financial, administrative and legal burdens as well as changing demands regarding work-life balance have resulted in an increased emphasis on clinical practice at the expense of research activities by orthopaedic trauma surgeons. This has led to an overall decrease in the number of scientifically active clinicians in orthopaedic trauma surgery, which represents a serious burden on research in this field. In order to guarantee that the clinical relevance of this discipline is also mirrored in the scientific field, new concepts are needed to keep clinicians involved in research.

METHODS:

Literature review and discussion of the results of a survey. RESULTS/

CONCLUSION:

An interdisciplinary and -professional team approach involving clinicians and basic scientists with different fields of expertise appears to be a promising method. Although differences regarding motivation, research focuses, funding rates and sources as well as inhibitory factors for research activities between basic scientists and clinicians exist, successful and long-lasting collaborations have already proven fruitful. For further implementation of the team approach, diverse prerequisites are necessary. Among those measures, institutions (e.g. societies, universities etc.) must shift the focus of their support mechanisms from independent scientist models to research team performances.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ortopedia / Procedimientos Ortopédicos Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ortopedia / Procedimientos Ortopédicos Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania